Tishman Speyer Stuyvesant Town (NYC) Fraud
NY Judge says Racketeering Complaint (STUYVESANT TOWN) v. Tishman Speyer/Rose Associates/CWCapital & Borah Goldstein SHOWS MERIT, refuses to dismiss Complaint

In New York State Supreme Court, on March 27, 2012 New York State Supreme Court Justice Anil C. Singh denies Defendants Tishman Speyer, CWCapital Asset Management, Rose Associates (Adam Rose, Daniel Rose, Amy Rose), Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel (Robert Goldstein, Paul Gruber)’s additional attempt to avoid appearing in Court and orders Defendants to ANSWER THE RACKETEERING COMPLAINT concerning Stuyvesant Town fraud.  Justice Singh’s Order states reasons for the denial of Tishman Speyer’s desperate attempt to dismiss complaint, including:  “AFTER CAREFUL CONSIDERATION, THE COURT FINDS THE COMPLAINT SHOWS MERIT…”.

Tishman Speyer, CWCapital Asset Managment, Rose Associates Inc. (Adam Rose, Daniel Rose, Amy Rose), BlackRock Realty, and Federal law repeat violators debt collector “law firm” Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel, P.C. will be required to admit/deny their tax-evading, racketeering transfer of ownership of Stuyvesant Town and harassment of female rent stabilzed tenants in their scheme to illegally de-regulate and de-stabilize Rent Stabilized Apartments.