Tishman Speyer Stuyvesant Town (NYC) Fraud
BREAKING NEWS: The Named Stuyvesant Town Racketeering Defendants CW Capital and ST OWNER LP (Tishman Speyer) and others involved in the Female Attorney and Stuyvesant Town Tenant Plaintiff’s racketeering lawsuit pending for over four years have been SUED by Junior Lenders in the Stuyvesant Town Foreclosure in a Scathing Complaint alleging THE SAME MISCONDUCT as the Female Attorney claims!

BREAKING NEWS: The Named Stuyvesant Town Racketeering Defendants CW Capital and ST OWNER LP (Tishman Speyer) and others involved in the Female Attorney and Stuyvesant Town Tenant Plaintiff’s racketeering lawsuit pending for over four years have been SUED by Junior Lenders in the Stuyvesant Town Foreclosure in a Scathing Complaint alleging THE SAME MISCONDUCT as the Female Attorney claims, including ‘racketeering’ misconduct:

TheStuyvesant Town junior lenders headed by Centerbridge Partners further allege that CWCapital engaged in “a continuing pattern of misconduct designed” to maintain control of Stuyvesant Town and “reap an unjust windfall” of $1 billion, according to Bloomberg News.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-07-03/cwcapital-wachovia-bank-are-sued-by-stuyvesant-lenders.html

The New Stuyvesant Town Complaint against CW Capital filed by the Junior Lenders can be found on the Female Attorney and Tenant Crime Victim’s document site [that has over 71,000 views (cumulative)!] – some people are listening to her New York State Unified Court System, maybe you should try it - : PCVST Mezzco 4 LLC v. Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C30, 652045/2014, New York State Supreme Court, New York County (Manhattan):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/232517418/STUYVESANT-TOWN-LITIGATION-AGAINST-CWCapital-by-junior-lenders-PCVST-Mezzco-4-LLC-v-Wachovia-Bank-Commercial-Mortgage-Trust-2007-C30-652045-2014-Ne

and..WOW further BREAKING NEWS: SHOCKING UNDISPUTED ALLEGATIONS against CW Capital and its named racketeering co-conspirators and maybe New York State Unified Court System should start apologizing to the Female Attorney for its discrimination and contribution to the following SHOCKING misconduct and criminal acts as alleged to be committed by CW Capital and its named racketeering co-defendants and DEFENSE ATTORNEYS: including Adam Rose (Rose Associates, Inc.), Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel (Paul N. Gruber, Esq., Robert D. Goldstein, Esq.) (212) 431-1300, Nicholas Himonidis, Esq. (646) 445-7801, Rose Associates’ and now CW Capital’s (CompassRock) henchman Fred D. Knapp, Esq. (212) 420-5000 and New York City Housing Court JUDGES Laurie L. Lau and Gerald Lebovits: allegations of violent and criminal intimidation of an Officer of the Court and Victim/Witness (the Female Attorney and Crime Victim Plaintiff in the pending Stuyvesant Town racketeering lawsuits) filed in pre-action disclosure petition:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/223759234/Verified-Petition-Affidavit-of-Petitioner-In-Support-of-Order-to-Show-Cause-for-Pre-Action-Disclosure-Temporary-Restraining-Order-and-Preliminary-Inj

It is apparent now why named racketeering defendants CW Capital Asset Management, Tishman Speyer, Rose Associates, Inc. (Adam Rose, Fred Knapp, Esq., Gregory Claude), Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel law firm (Paul N. Gruber, Esq., Robert D. Goldstein), New York City Housing Court judges Laurie L. Lau, Gerald Lebovits, Brenda Spears and their Gestapo Squad of thugs including the NYPD 13th precinct, Midtown Moving & Storage, Inc. went to such violent and criminal extremes as alleged in the above linked Petition to discredit and “commit financial and judicial terrorism” against the Female Attorney and Crime Victim/Tenant:

Named racketeering Defendants CW Capital didn’t want the Female Attorney to continue to blow the whistle on CW Capital and its racketeering co-defendants: “ continuing pattern of misconduct” in order for CW Capital to “reap an unjust windfall” of 1 BILLION dollars.

The New Complaint against the named CW Capital and Tishman Speyer racketeering defendants by the millionaire junior lenders against the CW Capital senior Stuyvesant Town lenders makes the following similar allegations that the Female Attorney and Crime Victim Tenant has previously made (yet; the Female attorney alleges that she has been subjected to CW Capital and its attorneys and co-defendants “misogynist threats and abuse” calling her a ‘crazy c*nt’ ‘stupid bitch’ and attempting to discredit her as ‘not sane’ for making the SAME ALLEGATIONS reagarding the continuing pattern of misconduct by CW Capital):

“This Complaint arises out of Defendants’ [CWCapital, ST OWNER LP (Tishman Speyer)] improper actions to wrongfully seize control of …Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village (“Stuyvesant Town”) … through a purported deed in lieu of foreclosure transaction orchestrated and consummated on both sides by CW Capital.”

“The deed in lieu of [foreclosure] transaction was the culmination of a continuing pattern of misconduct designed to (i) keep CWCapital in control of Stuy Town, including its contemplated disposition…”

“Through these wrongful actions, CW Capital will capture an unjustified billion dollar windfall for itself and the other Defendants (including Tishman Speyer).

49. By obtaining the Foreclosure Judgment, CW Capital made an irrevocable decision that it was willing to give up contract and default rate interest in exchange for obtaining the benefits of having a Foreclosure Judgment.”

69. CW Capital intentionally concealed the purported deed in lieu of foreclosure from its Junior Lenders (i.e., despite having secretly obtained a ‘purported deed in lieu of foreclosure’ failed to mention it in an email to its junior lenders later that day.”

Cat got your tongue, New York State Unified Court System? Oh, and where is New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman? How does Governor Cuomo feel now about his million dollar campaign contributer and appointee to New York State Real Estate Committees member…named racketeering defendant Rob Speyer (Tishman Speyer)?

BREAKING NEWS: New York State Supreme Court rules that Stuyvesant Town Named Racketeering Defendants CWCapital Asset Management’s agent and co-defendant thug MIDTOWN MOVING & STORAGE INC. had no legal right to keep all of Attorney and Tenant Victim’s property and Legal Files for OVER TWO YEARS and REFUSES to dismiss tenant’s claims for Conversion, Criminal Mischief, Theft of Property, Extortion, Interference with Contract and Intentional and Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress.

BREAKING NEWS: New York State Supreme Court rules that Stuyvesant Town Named Racketeering Defendants CWCapital Asset Management’s agent and co-defendant thug MIDTOWN MOVING & STORAGE INC. had no legal right to keep all of Attorney and Tenant Victim’s property and Legal Files for OVER TWO YEARS and REFUSES to dismiss tenant’s claims for Conversion, Criminal Mischief, Theft of Property, Extortion, Interference with Contract and Intentional and Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress.

A New York State Supreme Court Judge (Madden) rules in favor of female attorney and tenant crime victim in one of the Stuyvesant Town lawsuits by a tenant in a separate ‘Uniform Commercial Code special proceeding’ brought against named racketeering defendants CWCapital Asset Management, Tishman Speyer, Rose Associates, Inc. (Adam Rose), Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel’s racketeering co-defendant thugs MIDTOWN MOVING & STORAGE, INC. (810 East 170th Street, Bronx, NY 718-542-1440) finding that Midtown Moving (and presumably the unnamed ‘landlord’ i.e., CWCapital Asset Management, Rose Associates, Inc., and Borah Goldstein?) had no ‘possessory’ right to the female tenant crime victim’s household possessions and legal files which they refused to allow tenant to access for over two years!

The court order also stated that it is an ‘uncontested fact that there is no written storage agreement’ between the tenant crime victim and CWCapital Asset Management and Rose Associates, Inc.’s agent thugs Midtown Moving & Storage. In recently filed court documents, it is also revealed that Midtown Moving & Storage doesn’t have any written agreement with anyone including the unnamed ‘landlord’ concerning the alleged theft of the female attorney and tenant crime victim’s property.

Legally, for Midtown Moving & Storage to actually perform such duties as a ‘moving and storage company’ a written agreement is a requirement under New York law. What kind of legal, or illegal, implications does this fact reveal?

Is Midtown Moving & Storage, Inc. concealing the real identity of the ‘landlord’ because as the female attorney and tenant crime victim has been repeatedly alleging in court documents for over two years that the transfer of the property of Stuyvesant Town actually occurred in January 2010 NOT last week when CWCapital Asset Management suddenly canceled the scheduled auction of the property and took the ‘deed in lieu of foreclosure’ AND paid the over $130 million in transfer tax?

http://commercialobserver.com/2014/06/auction-for-stuy-town-canceled-as-cwcapital-grabs-deed-in-lieu-of-foreclosure/

In the subsequent court filings, named racketeering defendants CWCapital Asset Management, Rose Associates, Inc., Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel’s racketeering co-defendant thugs Midtown Moving attempted to validate their actions by submitting a ‘warrant of eviction’ which as the court papers submitted by the tenant crime victim allege prove that the so-called ‘warrant of eviction’ was issued on a prior lease not in effect at the time of the illegal taking of tenant’s apartment.

New York law requires that for a warrant of eviction to be legal and valid, a proceeding concerning the possessory lease needs to filed giving the tenant notice and opportunity to be heard. (New York Real Property Action and Proceedings Law (RPAP) Article 7). Looks like named racketeering defendant Housing Court Judge Laurie L. Lau has some splainin’ to do: as alleged in the court documents Housing Court Judge Laurie L. Lau apparently signed a ‘default’ judgment i.e., without allowing tenant crime victim the opportunity to be heard, and issued/”robosigned” the warrant of eviction on the old lease in violation of New York law.

Looks like all the evidence that the female attorney and tenant crime victim has been prevented from obtaining by the alleged illegal wrangling of the racketeering defendants’ influence over the New York State Supreme Court judges will be revealed during this proceeding: the judge allowed the tenant crime victim to go to a jury for determination of damages concerning Midtown Moving’s unauthorized retention of her property and legal files for over two years as well as for all the other causes of action.

Wonder what Governor Cuomo and his cronies, named racketeering defendants Tishman Speyer and Rob Speyer, as well as New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman are going to do when a female attorney and tenant crime victim succeeds in doing the job they refuse to do because of their financial and political connections. Time to get Governor Cuomo and his cronies out of office.

Tenants Rights: 1

Racketeering Defendants and Robosigning Judges: 0.

HOW FAR WILL THE NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT JUDGES IN THE FIRST DEPARTMENT GO TO COVER-UP THE ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT OF THEIR COLLEAGUES and THE LAWYERS (Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel) THAT FUND THEIR CAMPAIGNS?

HOW FAR WILL THE NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT JUDGES IN THE FIRST DEPARTMENT GO TO COVER-UP THE ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT OF THEIR COLLEAGUES and THE LAWYERS (Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel) THAT FUND THEIR CAMPAIGNS?

It looks like another New York County Supreme Court Judge DONNA MILLS jumped on the “bending over backwards” bandwagon for the racketeering co-conspirators named in current civil litigation in the New York Supreme Court including Real Estate Millionaire ADAM ROSE (Rose Associates, Inc.) involved in the Stuyvesant Town $25 million dollar tax fraud litigations.*FN1 below.

Apparently, JUDGE DONNA MILLS just robo-signed the handwritten order written by named racketeering co-conspirator ADAM ROSE’S very own named racketeering co-conspirator lawyer DEBRA GUZOV, ESQ. (GUZOV, INC.) ORDERING YAHOO, INC. and TUMBLR, Inc. TO HAND OVER all of our private identification information despite the fact that named RACKETEERING CO-CONSPIRATOR ADAM ROSE didn’t state any valid claims AND his claims are outside the statute of limitations.

ANOTHER example of the corruption in the New York State Unified Court System—-and this blog is not the first blog to disclose this information concerning the favoritism and bias of the New York State Unified Court System (NY County) http://newyorkcourtcorruption.blogspot.com: A VERY OWN COURT EMPLOYEE of the New York State Bar Disciplinary Committee blew the whistle on the New York State Unified Court System stating that she was told to white-wash complaints against certain attorneys and law firms. This is the very same disciplinary committee that has been working for the named racketeering co-conspirators ADAM ROSE, DEBBIE GUZOV, Esq., Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel, P.C. (Robert D. Goldstein, Esq.), as well as a named racketeering co-conspirator Judge Gerald Lebovits during the legal proceedings to harass the female attorney and victim of violent crimes committed by these very same attorney and real estate named racketeers attempting to get the private information of this blog—- how much you want to bet Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel are attorneys that the Disciplinary Committee refused to investigate? See Anderson v. New York State Unified Court System (SDNY Index No. 07civ09599) (In Judge Shira A. Scheindlin’s US Federal Court Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson Reveals a “Cleaner”, Naomi Goldstein, at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department ETHICS Committee allegedly Whitewashing Complaints for US Attorneys, DA’s and Lawyers who have a political and financial ties to the Courts.)

Another example of what happens to individuals who blow the whistle on the *alleged criminal acts of New York State Court employees – cover-ups and harassment even against attorneys.

*FN1 See Roberts v. Tishman Speyer http://www.courts.state.ny.us/Reporter/3dseries/2009/2009_07480.htm and New York Magazine article about the scheme http://nymag.com/realestate/features/53797/ describing the scheme to violate New York Rent Stabilized law to illegally turn over apartments to charge market rate all the while collecting J-51 $25 million dollars in tax breaks for Rent Stabilized (“At the weekly staff meetings at the on-site management office[Rose Associates, Inc. for Stuyvesant Town], the most important question was, How many rent-stabilized apartments had been recovered? You would get a daily e-mail if they got a unit back,” a former employee explains. Rob [Speyer, Tishman Speyer]’s team had developed a two-part strategy for making the Stuy Town deal work. They would remove tenants who were illegally occupying rent-stabilized apartments, at one point employing three different law firms in the effort [Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins& Goidel, Belkin Burden]. Tishman Speyer has issued 1,009 nonrenewal notices, totaling 12 percent of the rent-stabilized leases. At one of the meetings, in December 2006, Adam Rose, the co-president of Rose Associates who was managing Stuy Town’s operations at the time, set off alarms among the group when he told them it would be realistic to recover just 8 percent of the rent-stabilized apartments in the first year, which was almost double the historical average.”

HERE ARE OUR FILED OBJECTIONS TO RACKETEERING DEFENDANT ADAM ROSE (Rose Associates Inc.)’s IMPROPER ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN OUR CONFIDENTIAL PRIVATE IDENTITY INFORMATION in Adam R. Rose v. Yahoo! Inc., and Tumble (Index No. 152439/2014 New York Supreme Court, New York County)

CASE NUMBER: Index Number 152439/2013 

Adam R. Rose v. Yahoo Inc. et. al

TO: Judge Donna Mills

111 Centre Street, Room 545

New York, NY 10013

(646) 386-3348

ANONYMOUS BLOGGER/(S) STUYVESANT TOWN FRAUD’s

OBJECTIONS TO Millionaire Real Estate Exec. Adam Rose’s Request for Constitutionally Protected Identity Information

In order to maintain my ANONYMITY, which is my constitutional right, I will post my objections to Millionaire Real Estate Exec. Adam Rose’s ( of Rose Associates, Inc., 200 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10010 (212) ) attempt to violate my rights by trying to get confidential and protected identity information of ANONYMOUS BLOGGER/(S) through his request for pre-action discovery, TO THE WEBSITES named in the request, so the court can go to the websites and verify that these objections are coming from the Anonymous Blogger/(s) of the websites.

I, THE ANONYMOUS BLOGGER/(S) of the websites, hereby affirms under penalty of perjury to the truth of the following:

1. I am an Anonymous Blogger/(s) that is the author of the tumblr, wordpress and twitter posts attached to Millionaire Real Estate Exec. Adam Rose’s affidavit as exhibits 1-3. I submit these affirmed objections to oppose Adam Rose’s request for pre-action discovery of all identity information of the blogger/s, blogs and posts by the means stated in this court’s order of March 25, 2014 (i.e. written objections) which was sent to me by Tumblr and Twitter (wordpress is not aware of the action).

2. I have never been served a copy of the stipulated order that was filed on April 5, 2014 as directed in the order, but to preserve my rights I am submitting these objections and serving and filing them through the courts on-line filing system which I am told automatically e-mails attorneys for Adam Rose and Tumblr and Twitter.

3. First and foremost, the frivolous request should be denied because Adam Rose has simply failed to even IDENTIFY ANY STATEMENTS and before the court considers anything, Adam Rose was required to show an actionable claim of defamatory statements —- he failed to do so, and even failed to point to STATEMENTS that he doesn’t like. This Blogger respectfully requests that this court actually read the posts attached to Adam Rose’s Affidavit – to see that the QUOTED TEXT that Adam Rose points to including: “corrupt white collar criminal” and Adam Rose’s malicious FALSE STATEMENT in his Affidavit paragraph 7:”…even claiming I[Adam Rose] was under “indictment” or Adam Rose’s allegations that the blog posts falsely say that he is being under investigation by the federal authorities ARE NOT FOUND ANYWHERE IN THE BLOG POSTS. The fact that Adam Rose absolutely LIED about the very existence of posts “claiming [Adam Rose] was under “indictment”” should be enough for this court to DENY his request based on his INTENTIONAL FALSE STATEMENTS UNDER OATH.

Additionally, the phrase “connection to child pornography” was used in a QUESTION —- followed by question marks and in the context of discussing the court documents that allege Adam Rose and his attorneys are in possession of documents from a legal case that include documents depicting child pornography. See Affidavit of Adam Rose Exhibit 1, posts 3 discussing latest developments in court proceedings.

4. Second, even with Adam Rose’s FAILURE to EVEN SAY THE STATEMENTS which defeats his attempt to make out a claim for defamation, this court must look at the random words IN CONTEXT AND THE ACTUAL STATEMENTS. For instance: Adam Rose conveniently and with intent to DECEIVE THIS COURT TO OBTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND PROTECTED INFORMATION through deceit, Adam Rose fails to mention that before each of the words that Adam Rose doesn’t like and in the full context of the sentences are statements: “as alleged in court proceedings” “in court documents” “alleged” —— all commenting and reporting on legal proceedings and the allegations in those documents as well as blogger/s’ opinions about the allegations.

5. CASE LAW: Even though Adam Rose did not even quote any statements that he is required to do to allege a claim of defamation, even his lawyer Debra Guzov, Esq. argued in a case against pre-action discovery the following which applies here: These cases and statements were found NOT ACTIONABLE:

Bruno v. Shukart, 177 N.Y.S. 2D 51 (Monroe Sup. 1958)(“[y]ou’re a liar and a crook” and “[y]ou’re a no-good crook” held to be non-actionable, and holding that the term “crook” in particular is not slander per se.”)

Torain v. Liu, 2007 WL 2331073 *2-3 (statements made by city council member at a press conference that plaintiff was a “lunatic” and “a sick pedophile loser” were not defamatory.”)

Polish Am. Immigration Relief Comm. Inc.,189 A.D. 2D at 374, 596 N.Y.S.2d 756 (1993)(description of organization as “madhouse” and its members as “thieves” and “false do-gooders” constituted non-actionable expressions of opinions under Federal or State constitutional standards.”

Kneival v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1075 (9th Cir. 2004)([t]he context in which the statement appears is paramount to our analysis [of whether statement is defamatory], and in some cases can be dispositive”and “although the word ‘pimp’ may be reasonably capable of defamatory meaning when read in isolation, we agree with the District Court’s assessment that ‘the term loses its meaning when considered in the context.” Id. At 1074.

Koch v. Goldway, 817 F.2d 507, 509 (9th Cir. 1987)(“[c]ontext does resolve the matter”).

Old Dominion Branch No. 496, Nat’l Ass’n of Letter Carriers v. Austin, 418 U.S. 264, 286 (1974)(protecting “rhetorical hyperbole, a lusty and imaginative expression of contempt” such as defendant’s characterization of plaintiff as a “scab” and a “traitor” with “rotten principles” )

Mann v. Abel, 10 N.Y.3d 271, 279 (2008)(“[e]xpressions of opinion are deemed privileged, and no matter how offensive, cannot be the subject of an action for defamation.”)

“The New York Constitution provides absolute protection from defamation from defamation suits for statements of rhetorical hyperbole.” Immuno AG. v. Moor-Jamkowski, 77 N.Y.2d 235, 249 (1991)(the “protections afforded by the guarantees of free press and speech in the New York Constitution is often broader than the minimum required by” the Federal Constitution.)

The Blogs in question discuss various legal and political issues concerning the financial crisis, the integrity of the American legal system and legal cases across the country and the world and have a worldwide public interest AND do not focus solely on Adam Rose or the Stuyvesant Town foreclosure and tax fraud.

6. The blogs in question are a public forum to discuss the various legal cases and issues concerning the financial crisis, mortgages, foreclosures (including the Bernie Madoff cases), as well as cases involving the public integrity and misconduct of public officials, police, judges, lawyers, and wall street executives across the country and worldwide. The blog also reports on the various investigations and U.S. Attorneys in many states’ actions and decisions. This reporting on public legal proceedings concerns topics of great public interest, not only in New York City, but across the United States and WORLDWIDE.

7. The blogs in question do not focus solely on Adam Rose, nor solely on the Stuyvesant Town foreclosure and the Roberts v. Tishman, 13 N.Y.3d 270 (2009) case http://tinyurl.com/c6jgml6 which found that those involved in Stuyvesant Town did in fact improperly violate the New York rent stabilized law and they did in fact obtain over $25 million dollars in improper tax breaks (i.e. which can be defined as ‘tax fraud’). Adam Rose was involved in the management of Stuyvesant Town during that time and also was involved in the planning stages of the owners’ scheme to destabilize rent stabilized apartments at Stuyvesant Town. See as reported on another website: http://nymag.com/realestate/features/53797/ (“At the weekly staff meetings at the on-site management office[Rose Associates, Inc. for Stuyvesant Town], the most important question was, How many rent-stabilized apartments had been recovered? You would get a daily e-mail if they got a unit back,” a former employee explains. Rob [Speyer, Tishman Speyer]’s team had developed a two-part strategy for making the Stuy Town deal work. They would remove tenants who were illegally occupying rent-stabilized apartments, at one point employing three different law firms in the effort [Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins& Goidel, Belkin Burden]. Tishman Speyer has issued 1,009 nonrenewal notices, totaling 12 percent of the rent-stabilized leases. At one of the meetings, in December 2006, Adam Rose, the co-president of Rose Associates who was managing Stuy Town’s operations at the time, set off alarms among the group when he told them it would be realistic to recover just 8 percent of the rent-stabilized apartments in the first year, which was almost double the historical average.”).

8. The blogs in question report on various legal proceedings, police cases, financial frauds across the country as well as my personal political and religious opinions at times. Because Adam Rose doesn’t agree with the personal political and religious opinions of the anonymous blogger/s doesn’t give him the right to violate my First Amendment Rights to report on pending litigation and to express my political and religious opinions (i.e., Adam Rose attached a tweet (1 of only 3 tweets) as a post he didn’t like which is directed at the U.S. State Department concerning Israel’s oppression of Palestinians and my political opinion that the U.S. State department shouldn’t get involved and should instead deal with the financial crisis here in the United States). (See Adam Rose’s Exhibit 3).

Statute of Limitations for defamation cause of action has expired= no valid cause of action

9. I object to the request for pre-action discovery of confidential identity information on the grounds that the Statute of Limitations has expired for Adam Rose’s alleged claims for defamation concerning any blog posts and statements he is complaining about prior to March of 2013. And request that the court disregard Adam Rose’s attempt to deceive this court into thinking he has a valid claim by using words and phrases that do not even exist in the attached 4 tumblr posts, 1 wordpress post, and 3 tweets (twitter) attached as ‘evidence’ to Adam Rose’s affidavit.

10. The Blogs in question: (1) Tumblr blog: http://tishmanspeyerfraud.tumblr.com/ (2) Wordpress: http://tishmanspeyerfraud.wordpress.com/category/stuyvesant-town/ and (3) Twitter: https://twitter.com/StuyTownFraud have been in existence for 3 ½ years (tumblr), 3 years (twitter) and 2 years (wordpress). While not all those who follow the blogs are publicly identified, the twitter blog is followed by (meaning, the accounts specifically request to be notified when new tweets are posted) news organizations (e.g. ny post), reporters from nationwide news organizations (e.g., bloomberg news), fraud whistleblowers, and politicians (chuck schumer and senator liz krueger) and others interested in the public discussions. There are no commercial advertisements on the blogs, it is for Blogger/s commentary and expression of opinions concerning public interest cases and events.

The Requests are overbroad and improperly/illegally request confidential and protected information for: EVERY LONG-IN INFORMATION for the life of the Blogs as well as EVERY identifying information for EVERY POST – including posts that cannot be the subject of any actionable claim (Statute of Limitations expired) and posts that are not alleged by Adam Rose as defamatory and are NOT NECESSARY AND MATERIAL to form a claim.

11. I object to the request for pre-action discovery of confidential identity information on the grounds that the request is overbroad asks for EVERY LOG-IN for identifying information and for EVERY and ALL POSTS which not only violate privacy and First Amendment Rights: (Adam Rose does not have a valid actionable claim for any post PRIOR to March 18, 2013 (he filed this action on March 18, 2014 – 1 year statute of limitation) and but also this information is “NOT NECESSARY OR MATERIAL” to form a complaint which Adam Rose has to prove also to violate blogger/s constitutional rights.

12. THE DATES OF ALL THE BLOG POSTS are Publicly Available on the posts. On Tumblr, the dates of whether or not any posts are under the one year statute of limitation are easily publicly accessible: GO TO THE ARCHIVE button on the left column of the Tumblr web site. There, it goes by date – and put the cursor over the archived posts, and the EXACT date shows up. Adam Rose does not need LOG IN information to ascertain the dates. Wordpress and Twitter have the dates on them.

NO VALID CAUSE OF ACTION for DEFAMATION: Defamation requires the exact statement that Adam Rose alleges is defamatory. He has not shown ANYWHERE on ANY POST he used as EVIDENCE any quoted statements that he is alleging is defamatory.

13. I object to the request for pre-action disclosure on the grounds that Adam Rose has failed to allege any statements in the attached blog posts to his Affidavit Tumblr (4 posts); Wordpress (1 post) and Twitter (3 tweets) that are grounds for a valid cause of action for defamation.

14. Adam Rose lied about when he became aware of the blogs because in May 9, 2012, Adam Rose and his lawyer Debra Guzov, Esq. sent TUMBLR a notice pursuant to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act claiming the blog violated a copyright in “emails” that he sent to the Plaintiff in the pending lawsuits reported on in the blogs that were part of the public court record AND an email posted on another blog (Lux Living) in which Adam Rose harassed THAT anonymous blogger. See blog post attached to Adam Rose’s Affidavit Exhibit 1 (posts 1 and 2) that describes the incident. See Attachment 1below, a copy of the May 9, 2012 (two years ago) Adam Rose and Debra Guzov, Esq. Attempt to claim defamation with the DMCA letter.

15. Adam Rose’s First Attempt to Illegally Obtain the Information Requested in this Action: the Constitutionally Protected Anonymous Blogger/s Identities: On May 9, 2012, Adam Rose and his lawyer sent a DMCA letter to Tumblr concerning harassing emails that Adam Rose wrote to two tenants: one, the anonymous blogger of the blog Lux Living, and the others to the female tenant lawyer who is the plaintiff in the pending litigations against Adam Rose. All those emails were and are still in the public court records. BUT, in order to dispute a frivolous DMCA notice, TUMBLR requires the Anonymous Blogger’s to IDENTIFY themselves. This is another illegal way to violate the rights of Anonymous Bloggers. To protect myself, physically also since the documented violent acts that Adam Rose is accused of (and has never denied in any court document) are quite violent and the acts Adam Rose is accused of committing against the female tenant lawyer in the pending cases are outrageous years long attacks, I chose not to disclose my Identity and to voluntary remove the QUOTES of the emails (since no actual physical emails were posted, just quotes from the court documents.) Compare the First Two blog posts in Exhibit 1 of Adam Rose’s Affidavit. At no point was this Anonymous Blogger found guilty of violating ANY terms of service of Tumblr or even the DMCA, I just chose to exercise my First Amendment Right to maintain my anonymity.

16. Also, even though Adam Rose and Debra Guzov, Esq. told TUMBLR the blog was ‘defamatory’ and violated their terms of service —- TUMBLR did not agree AND did not take down the blog because this blog did NOT VIOLATE THE TERMS OF SERVICE, and IS NOT DEFAMATORY, NOT HARRASSING, NOT ABUSIVE – according to TUMBLR’s refusal to agree with Adam Rose and Debra Guzov’s claims of ‘defamation.’

17. Adam Rose’s SECOND Attempt to Illegally Obtain the Information Requested in this Action: the Constitutionally Protected Anonymous Blogger/s Identities: As reported in the Blog post in Exhibit 1 of Adam Rose’s Affidavit, posts 1 and 2 (dated March 2014), Adam Rose and Debra Guzov, Esq. asked the disciplinary committee of the Bar to attempt to get the Anonymous Blogger/s identities by harassing the female lawyer plaintiff in the pending litigation in concealed from the public proceedings free of charge to Adam Rose and to hide from the public this second illegal attempt to violate the First Amendment Rights of anonymous bloggers. ADAM ROSE AND HIS LAWYER DEBRA GUZOV DO NOT DENY THE ALLEGATIONS IN THE POSTS CONCERNING THIS FACT.

18. Defamation requires specific statements and the statements must be defamatory IN CONTEXT. Here, Adam Rose just says words (and phrases that he QUOTES THAT ARE NOT IN ANY BLOG POST ATTACHED AS EVIDENCE). See above case law paragraph 5 above. Adam Rose conveniently leaves out the fact that the words he objects to are preceded by the phrases including “as alleged in court documents” – IN CONTEXT discussing allegations in court documents and opinions about them.

18 a. Also, THERE IS NO WHERE IN THE BLOG POSTS submitted by Adam Rose as Evidence nor any statement that he identifies supporting his claim that the blog posts “falsely accuse [Adam Rose] of being under investigation by the federal authorities” Adam Rose Affidavit Paragraph 5. Adam Rose didn’t even quote any statement to support this – all this court has to do is ACTUALLY READ THE POSTS – and only the POSTS SUBMITTED.

19. The Specific Posts attached as Evidence: Tumblr Posts (4 of them)(Adam Rose Affidavit, Exhibit 1):

(a) Posts 1 and 2 (dated March 11, 2014, March 7, 2014): commentary about Adam Rose and Debra Guzov’s DMCA attempt to shut down the blog with false claims of defamation (first attempt), the commentary on the e-mail evidence submitted in court proceedings concerning Adam Rose’s harassment through e-mails against another anonymous blogger in addition to the female lawyer who is the plaintiff in pending litigation, and the secret proceedings by the new york courts free of charge to Adam Rose to illegally obtain anonymous bloggers identities second attempt): any references to Adam Rose refer to him in the CONTEXT of describing the legal proceedings and the allegations of the complaints including the causes of action against him racketeering, felony criminal mischief; the posts describe documents in court proceedings submitted as evidence and my opinion and commentary on them.

(b) Post 3 (dated February 3, 2014): commentary IN CONTEXT discussing the latest news concerning legal proceedings, allegations of the submitted court documents Additionally, the phrase “connection to child pornography” was used in a QUESTION —- followed by question marks and in the context of discussing the court documents that allege Adam Rose and his attorneys are in possession of legal files that contain Disney documents that contain child pornographic scenes “Disney scripts in that lawsuit contained child pornography, sex in front of a priest, threesomes and other scenes that Disney and the Quinn Emanuel law firm wouldn’t want the public to know about”; as well as the secret proceedings by the new york courts free of charge to Adam Rose to illegally obtain anonymous bloggers identities (second attempt): any references to Adam Rose refer to him in the CONTEXT of describing the legal proceedings and the allegations of the complaints including the causes of action against him racketeering, felony criminal mischief; the posts describe documents in court proceedings submitted as evidence and my opinion and commentary on them.

(c) Post 4 (dated December 12, 2013): The Headline is directed at the New Yor Police Department (NYPD): “Hey NYPD, sound familiar?: FBI probe results in 18 LA sheriffs deputies indicted for conspiracy, obstruction of justice and civil rights violations”; concerns commentary and reporting on the Los Angeles Sheriff’s department including a press conference video, and references the similar allegations present in new york litigation against the New York Police Department and specifically the 13th precinct of the NYPD (the police officers who have alleged ties to Adam Rose and Stuyvesant Town.); and this Blogger/s’ opinions and hopes that a similar probe and arrest would occur concerning the defendants in the pending new york litigation (which include Adam Rose who was identified specifically as a DEFENDANT – clearly referring to and commenting on legal proceedings).

20. The Specific Posts attached as Evidence: Wordpress Post (1 post)(Adam Rose Affidavit, Exhibit 2): Post 1 (dated July 3, 2013): The headline concerns the adding of an additional defendant to the current pending lawsuits concerning the robo-signing in the New York City Housing Courts and the commentary and description of the allegations along with the identification of the other DEFENDANTS – including Adam Rose. And the posts concerns the description of the allegations. It appears as though Adam Rose wants to incite this Court by including a post concerning a defendant who is a colleague of this court (like other judges in the New York State Supreme Court system whose personal opinions and biases have improperly affected their decisions in the pending cases. This Anonymous Blogger/s respectfully requests that this Court not be sucked into Adam Rose’s improper attempt to incite this Court to rule against Anonymous Blogger/s by including a clearly non-defamatory and irrelevant post which focuses on legal proceedings brought against judges. Any references to Adam Rose refer to him in the CONTEXT of describing the legal proceedings and the allegations of the complaints and my opinion and commentary on them.

21. The Specific Posts attached as Evidence: Twitter Tweets (3 post)(Adam Rose Affidavit, Exhibit 3): First and Foremost, tweets are limited to 140 characters the CONTEXT and nature of tweets must be taken into consideration. Hashtags= “#” are used to drive twitter traffic to articles of interest concerning those words. A hashtag with a person’s name cannot be considered defamatory.

(a) Tweet 1 (concerns a Question to Governor Cuomo regarding his million dollar campaign contributor (Rob Speyer) a named defendant in some stuyvesant town legal proceedings (which Adam Rose managed at the time the allegations concern). The tweet includes a link to the above mentioned non-defamatory tumblr post concerning the legal proceedings that included the allegations that defendant Adam Rose and his attorneys and co-defendants were in unauthorized possession of the plaintiff attorney’s legal files which included a separate case against Disney, including Disney scripts containing child pornographic scenes. See Paragraph 19(b) above. Hashtags (#) indicated articles and websites that discuss and express their opinions on the hashtags. Adam Rose is not even in the tweet, just the link to the above-mentioned tumblr post.

(b) Tweet 2 (September 2, 2013 concerns this Anonymous Blogger/s personal political and religious opinions concerning the U.S.’s involvement with Israel and Israel’s request at the time for U.S. Involvement with its political agenda concerning Syrian Rebels at the time.) The Tweets MUST BE TAKEN IN CONTEXT – this tweet was part of a succession of tweets (the first of 3 – the second one continued the conversation: “@StateDept Should we as #Syrian #Rebels 2TakeCareOF #NYPD #criminals & #Tishman Speyer # Adam Rose #racketeers? #TakeCareOfYourCriminals” and then another Tweet that starts off: “Dear #SyrianRebels…” Again, the hashtags are merely references that you click on and the hashtag lists all articles/tweets concerning that hashtag. The “#AdamRose” hashtag – it is identified in blue meaning that when you click on his name, all tweets/articles on him will be listed —- including the tweets concerning his involvement with the numerous racketeering Stuyvesant town litigation. A HASHTAG leads the reader to ALL ARTICLES about the hashtag. Here, ‘Adam Rose’ name was a hashtag after a list of various hashtags which would lead to articles about the stuyvesant town racketeering (which is a crime which victims can sue for civil damages) cases. This tweet is my political and religious opinion and commentary on world wide news with great public interest. Just because Adam Rose doesn’t like or agree with my political and religious beliefs, doesn’t mean that the tweet is defamatory and to rule otherwise, would be a denial of my right to express my political and religious beliefs as well.

(c) Tweet 3 (July 4, 2013 this tweet is commentary concerning my belief that crimes against veterans are hate crimes and hate crimes if committed by individuals should be given prison sentences. In no way does that tweet make a statement that Adam Rose was sentenced to prison. Again, a hashtag leads to articles about the words – this hashtag concerning Adam Rose would lead to articles concerning the pending ligation and the allegations that Adam Rose committed felony criminal mischief against the female attorney tenant and violently destroyed property including her families’ property (including her father who was a Veteran) (all reported in legal proceedings and on the blogs) after she filed her racketeering lawsuit. Just because Adam Rose doesn’t like or agree with my political doesn’t mean that the tweet is defamatory and to rule otherwise, would be a denial of my right to express my political views.

Conclusion: Adam Rose failed to even identify STATEMENTS that he claims are defamatory and DOES NOT HAVE ANY ACTIONABLE VALID CAUSES OF ACTION – and even if he did, the information he requests (i.e. ALL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION FOR THE WHOLE 3 years of blog information) is NOT MATERIAL AND NECESSARY to form a claim.

Adam Rose has failed to support any reason to violate the First Amendment Rights to confidentiality and anonymity of Bloggers and it is requested that this Court deny the request.

Signed:

x Stuyvesant Town Fraud (Anonymous Blogger)

stuyvesant.town.fraud@gmail.com

ATTACHMENT 1 

(May 9, 2012 – Adam Rose’s First Attempt to illegally obtain Bloggers’ Identity – DMCA Notice)

image

image

image

image

NOT A SURPRISE: Millionaire Real Estate Racketeering Defendant and Suer of Blog Sites Adam Rose supported Penis Texter and Lack of Respect for Women-izer Anthony Weiner

Yes, no wonder Adam Rose seems to think he can get away with his misdeeds (See: http://tishmanspeyerfraud.tumblr.com/post/81212700420/breaking-news-millionaire-real-estate-racketeering ) in his harassing attempts to sue YAHOO and TUMBLR to violate the First Amendment Rights of bloggers who report on legal proceedings in which he is accussed of violent criminal acts, real estate tax fraud, racketeering and…harassing female tenants.

This is what Millionaire Real Estate Racketeering Defendant and Suer of Blog Sites Adam Rose (Rose Associates, Inc.) had to say about disgraced former Congressmen and uncontrollable penis texter Anthony Weiner last April when Anthony Weiner announced his soon to-fail-due-to-even-more-untrollable-penis-texting mayoral candidacy:

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ex-backers-cool-weiner-run-article-1.1314503

"Only one former donor contacted by The News — Adam Rose, co-president of apartment building developer Rose Associates — was openly enthusiastic, saying he’s “100%” behind Weiner trying another run for mayor.

“I think he’s a terrific candidate and would be a great mayor,” said Rose, who raised at least $13,500 for Weiner in 2008. He added, “Personal failings fade with time in people’s minds.”

"PERSONAL FAILINGS FAD WITH TIME IN PEOPLE’S MINDS." = this is what Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose apparently hopes by SUING BLOGS AND BLOGGERS for writing about legal proceedings and stating their opinions on them will accomplish —- to ILLEGALLY VIOLATE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS to keep the atrocities he is accused of committing OUT OF THE PUBLIC’S MIND. Is this Nazi Germany…or the United State of America?

Birds of a Feather.

BREAKING NEWS: Millionaire Real Estate Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose (of Rose Associates, Inc.) googles his name, doesn’t like being in the same paragraph as ‘child pornography’ SUES YAHOO and TUMBLR, TWITTER and Automattic (Wordpress) and he and his Racketeering Codefendant Debra Guzov, Esq. (Guzov Offsink) submit FALSE AFFIDAVITS/AFFIRMATIONS to Illegally Obtain IDENTITES of ANONYMOUS BLOGGERS!?

BREAKING NEWS: Millionaire Real Estate Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose (of Rose Associates, Inc.) googles his name, doesn’t like being in the same paragraph as ‘child pornography’ SUES YAHOO and TUMBLR, TWITTER and Automattic (Wordpress) and he and his Racketeering Codefendant Debra Guzov, Esq. (Guzov Offsink) submit FALSE AFFIDAVITS/AFFIRMATIONS to Illegally Obtain IDENTITES of ANONYMOUS BLOGGERS!? What are you afraid of Adam Rose?

Here’s Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose (of Rose Associates, Inc.) continuation of his pogrom and latest obsessive harassment and stalking of this blog and blogger (like he did to Lux Living) in order to VIOLATE THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS of bloggers and journalists reporting on public legal proceedings in which Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose is accused of violent criminal acts including assault, harassment, criminal mischief against a female tenant and lawyer who exposed Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose’s participation in the Stuyvesant Town tax fraud and racketeering scheme:

FIND THE LEGAL DOCUMENTS HERE:

Frivolous Order to Show Cause for pre-action discovery to (improperly and illegally) OBTAIN THE IDENTITIES OF ANONYMOUS BLOGGERS : http://tinyurl.com/OSCtoGetAnonymousBloggersIds

AFFIDAVIT of Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose : http://tinyurl.com/AffidavitAdamRose

EXHIBIT 1 Blog Posts he doesn’t like: http://tinyurl.com/laxvq22

EXHIBIT 2 Blog Posts he doesn’t like: http://tinyurl.com/l5kdawn

EXHIBIT 3 Twitter Posts he doesn’t like: http://tinyurl.com/k7wzcpa


AFFIRMATION OF Racketeering Defendant Lawyer Debra Guzov, Esq. (Guzov Offsink):
http://tinyurl.com/AffirmationDebraGuzovEsq

EXHIBIT 1 Tumblr Privacy Statement :http://tinyurl.com/ldsmcp3 

EXHIBIT 2 Automattic (Wordpress)’s Privacy Statement: http://tinyurl.com/lj52ppr

EXHIBIT 3 Twitter Privacy Statement: http://tinyurl.com/kp9fc56

MEMORANDUM OF LAW of Racketeering Defendant Debra Guzov, Esq. : http://tinyurl.com/lhlf558

JUST a Sample of FALSE STATEMENTS UNDER OATH made by Racketeering Defendants Adam Rose (Rose Associates, Inc.) and Lawyer Debra Guzov, Esq. (Guzov Offsink) – Isn’t that a CRIMINAL OFFENSE…Perjury? Shouldn’t a LAWYER be DISBARRED for LYING to the COURT during LEGAL PROCEEDINGS? What do you think New York State Unified Court System and New York Attorney General’s Office? We know you are reading this blog, too —- you can’t lie about not knowing, now can you?

(1) Racketeering Defendant LAWYER Debra Guzov, Esq. - LIES and says “6. No previous application has been made for the relief requested herein[IDENTITY OF ANONYMOUS BLOGGERS OF THIS WEBSITE]” – really?

What about you and Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose (Rose Associates, Inc.)’s ‘application’ i.e., demand to the court’s disciplinary committee to do your bidding for free to demand that your victim ( and the female tenant and lawyer who is suing you) tell you the identities of bloggers. SEE: Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose’s own Exhibit 1 of blog posts above: http://tinyurl.com/laxvq22 – and here: http://tishmanspeyerfraud.tumblr.com/post/75514004729/breaking-news-in-stuyvesant-town-racketeering-lawsuit

THAT’s why secret New York State Court Proceedings are improper and violate the PUBLIC’s right to know what the government/court is doing. Racketeering Defendant LAWYER Debra Guzov’s LIES under oath would never have been known! What do you think now New York State Unified Court System? Can’t pretend you didn’t see it…

(2) Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose LIES UNDER OATH and says that the Blog Posts he claims are ‘defamatory’ said: that ADAM ROSE WAS UNDER “INDICTMENT” FOR A CRIME? See Paragraph 7 of his Affidavit: “ (even claiming I [Adam Rose] was under ‘indictment’)” Really? Where Adam Rose? THE WORD ‘indictment’ is not even used in the blog posts that Adam Rose is falsely quoting NOR do the BLOG POSTS he is required to present to the court to prove he has a claim for defamation in order to obtain private anonymous bloggers’ information – DO NOT EVEN INCLUDE the falsely quoted word ‘indictment’ or any statement that Adam Rose was under indictment.

*** Racketeering Defendants Adam Rose and Lawyer Debra Guzov are willfully LYING to the COURT UNDER OATH because THEY HAVE NO ACTIONABLE CLAIMS AGAINST THIS BLOGGER OR ANY OTHER BLOGGER reporting on the public legal proceedings. They are hoping that the New York State Court Judge DONNA MILLS will be like her colleagues Racketeering Defendants Housing Court Judges Laurie L. Lau, Gerald Lebovits and Brenda Spears (named defendants in pending racketeering lawsuits) who are accused in various legal proceedings of just rubber-stamping documents of these defendants without even READING the documents before them (i.e., robosigning). ****

*** Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose is LYING about WHEN he became aware of numerous websites because his time to sue for his frivolous defamation claims EXPIRED – he has no basis to demand the Court VIOLATE THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF ANONYMOUS BLOGGERS***

See: Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose and his Racketeering Codefendant Debra Guzov, Esq. (Guzov Offsink)’s May 9, 2012 – TWO YEARS AGO – frivolous DMCA Takedown Notice and original threat of defamation to TUMBLR and to this BLOG: http://tinyurl.com/mvycq7p


MORE EVIDENCE OF Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose and his Racketeering Codefendant Lawyer Debra Guzov, Esq.’s LIES will be posted – as well as this BLOG’ss OBJECTIONS to the Order to Show Cause.

ALSO – PUBLIC PROCEEDING ON THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE scheduled - go and see Racketeering Defendants in person and what the Court will do:

April 8, 2014 at 11:30 AM
Judge Donna Mills
Courtroom 574
111 Centre Street
New York, NY

*** Interesting: at the HOUSING COURT BUILDING – where it is alleged in pending legal proceedings that the robosigning and racketeering all began ***

BREAKING NEWS in Stuyvesant Town Racketeering Lawsuit: What do Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose (Rose Associates, Inc.), Child Pornography and Disney all have in common???

BREAKING NEWS: What do Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose, Child Pornography and Disney all have in common?

It’s been a while since there’s been any information on the long-standing and pending Stuyvesant Town Racketeering lawsuit and wow, bombshell allegations abound and the reasons for radio silence will probably not surprise you, but wait to hear what these Racketeering Defendants continue to do…and who’s helping them to harass the female attorney and crime victim who blew the whistle on them to federal and state officials (and yes, it includes more judges in the New York State Unified Court System e.g., one whose employee concealed the identity of racketeering defendants Borah Goldstein’s employee in the courtroom?!?!?!). The Court files are filled with bombshells!

(1) It appears as those little Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose and his co-conspirators L(iars)awyers Racketeering Defendants Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel, P.C. (Robert D. Goldstein), Debra Guzov (Guzov Offsink LLC) AND defendant NYC Housing Court judge Gerald Lebovits have been busy employing the same tactics like the Secret Service (S.S.) of the Nazi Regime by using the free services of the State Bar Disciplinary Committee to conduct secret proceedings against the female attorney who accused them in court proceedings of assaulting, harassing, stalking and violently destroying her property AND stealing her legal files AFTER she blew the whistle on the Tishman Speyer/Rose Associates Inc. (Adam Rose)/Borah Goldstein Residential Real Estate Racketeering and Tax Fraud Scheme implicating them.

AND, the REASON for the Nazi-like secret proceedings of the Racketeering Defendants’ friends at the Bar Disciplinary Committee???? Little Adam Rose and his Racketeering Co-Defendants don’t like what this blog and other anonymous blogs are legally reporting and they are falsely saying the blogs are defamatory?!?!? And, the Racketeering Defendants are trying to obtain the identities of bloggers not only from this blog but numerous other blogs who report Anonymously on the legal proceedings and give their opinions of the little Adam Rose (Rose Associates Inc.), Borah Goldstein, Tishman Speyer and Stuyvesant Town Racketeering and Tax Fraud Scheme Cases. The Racketeering Defendants are trying to get all of our identities without notice to the blogs and without proper legal proceedings instead they are going through confidential secret proceedings to force an attorney who’s a crime victim to disclose who she’s talking to claiming it’s a disciplinary proceeding. The female attorney and crime victim is fighting the Racketeering Defendants’ attempts to illegally obtain anonymous bloggers’ information through these illegal means.  And, of course, they are trying to make the female attorney crime victim look bad but it only looks like a cover-up by more New York State Court employees and judges! WOW! How can this be legal??? Hmmm, wow, maybe the bias by the judges and the New York State Courts that the attorney victim has repeatedly stated in her legal documents should not be ignored anymore.

** It appears as though the female attorney victim is allowed to talk about this now because the Racketeering Defendants mentioned the confidential proceedings in public court documents and apparently the filing of the complaints with the Bar committee are also the subject of some of her claims in the pending lawsuit.***

As the readers of this blog know, little Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose’s l(iar)awyer Debra Guzov, Esq. (Guzov Offsink LLC) who herself is named as part of the racketeering scheme in the Tishman Speyer racketeering lawsuits (other law firms and lawyers named in the lawsuit include: Robert D. Goldstein, Paul N. Gruber, Carla M. Seals (Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel, P.C., and Belkin Burden Wenig and Goldman, L.L.C.) tried to shut this blog down by saying the same things: falsely stating that this blog is ‘defamatory’ (because it reports on the Stuyvesant Town lawsuits) by sending a notice to the web host on MAY 9, 2012 – ALMOST TWO YEARS AGO. The web host clearly didn’t agree with them and cowardly li(ar)on Adam Rose and his modern day Gestapo-like attorneys Debra Guzov, Esq. never filed any lawsuits because they have no valid claims. Plus, I am told the statute of limitations for any of their harassing attempts for claims of defamation has expired. So what do they do??? They are going after an attorney and crime victim (whose case has been reported here) through secret proceedings to get anonymous bloggers identities. A MORE DETAILED POST ON THIS TOPIC INCLUDING WHAT LITTLE DEBBIE DOWNER GUZOV’S LETTER ON BEHALF OF ADAM “I’M NOT A REAL BOY” ROSE TO THE BLOG HOST DEMANDED AND WAS SHOTDOWN WILL BE POSTED LATER…..

……but now for the Racketeering and Harassment Defendant Adam Rose (Rose Associates, Inc.) and his dirty rent boys (and girls) including the NYPD 13th precinct’s connection to child pornography and Disney allegations…?!?!?!?!

(2) Is Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose (Rose Associates, Inc.) and his stable of Gestapo-like “lawyers” Racketeering Defendants including Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel (Robert Goldstein, Paul Gruber) and Little Debbie Guzov (Guzov Ofsink LLC) communicating with and acting in connection with Disney and its attorneys to help conceal Disney’s connection to child pornography? I know but just wait…and maybe now we can all understand why these defendants are violently attacking this female attorney and why they want to destroy her, literally.

Apparently in the latest court filings it was disclosed that the female attorney and crime victim’s legal files that were destroyed and stolen during the pending racketeering lawsuit (while some of the Racketeering Defendants were under court order to preserve the plaintiff’s property) included legal files concerning a separate pending case that the female attorney was involved in…which included (quoted from the court documents):  “Disney scripts involved in that lawsuit contained child pornography, sex in front of a priest, threesomes and other scenes that Disney and the Quinn Emanuel law firm wouldn’t want the public to know about…” Holy Disney Child Porn?!?! Say it ain’t so?!?!

Apparently, Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose and his attorneys (who are also defendants, remember) Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel, P.C. actually submitted documents from that separate Disney case and referenced the stolen documents —- how stupid can you get?!?!

Take some time to let this all sink in…more to come later…this anonymous blogger needs a drink. Yes, this stuff really happens.