Tishman Speyer Stuyvesant Town (NYC) Fraud
U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer’s admission as a member of the “Jewish Lobby”: More evidence of New York State’s discrimination in the courts and law enforcement – illegal favoritism to the “Jewish Lobby” and the use of cowardly tactic of calling anyone in opposition to Israeli Gaza Genocide, ‘anti-Semitic.’

The dirty truth of the Israeli Lobby’s use of the tactic to defame ANYONE who doesn’t support the slaughter of Palestinian women and children and who opposes the Israeli Lobby in litigation with allegations of their financial crimes and other criminal activity, is being exposed as the dirty scheme that it is: pure and simple, an Un-American tactic to conceal the war crimes and the U.S. federal crimes of its members. 

 U.S. Senator Chuck ‘Schmucky’ Schumer uses the Israeli Lobby “Hasbara Handbook” techniques http://www.popularresistance.org/how-the-israeli-lobby-persecutes-critics-in-academia/ to pursue his Israeli agenda in the U.S. Congress – wonder if Schumer is a dual citizen of Israel hiding it from the U.S.?  When loyalties to other countries interfere with loyalties to the United States, these people shouldn’t be in Congress.  Where’s the loyalty?  Isn’t the U.S. government, especially the defense department, susceptible to SPYING by these dual ‘loyalists’? It seems to us Schmucky Schumer’s loyalties are pretty clear cut:  to Isreal, not the U.S., now that’s a dangerous situation.

 “Schumer says his ‘Jewish Lobby’ almost brought [United States Secretary of Defense] Chuck Hagel to tears” http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/politics/2013/02/7879229/schumer-says-his-jewish-lobby-talk-almost-brought-chuck-hagel-tears  

 In a cry-baby display that is also part of the “Hasbara Handbook’ of the Israeli Lobby, Senator Schmucky Schumer allegedly attacked another member of Congress by calling him –yes, you guessed it – ‘anti-Semitic’ when they were meeting with the Isreali Lobby and the other congressional member questioned some of their policies.  Your true colors, sympathies and country loyalties are coming out…your little tactics are backfiring.

We have already seen in current situations in the New York Courts how the infiltration of the Isreali Lobby contradicting with the laws and human rights of the United States of America has defecated on the U.S. constitutional rights of U.S. citizens…including against this blog where the New York Courts bent over for Adam Rose (Rose Associates, Inc. – members of the Jewish Lobby with political and financial ties to politicians, judges, law enforcement) and his lawyer Debra Guzov, Esq. by handing over our personal confidential information because Adam Rose doesn’t like us exercising our constitutional rights as U.S. citizens to write about public litigation and our political opinions, so that Adam Rose and the Jewish Lobby can harass us and further deprive us of our U.S. constitutional rights (sounds familiar to typical Isreali Gaza Genocide tactics).  See: https://tishmanspeyerfraud.wordpress.com/2014/08/23/holocaust-survivor-reuven-moskovitz-compares-israels-actions-against-the-palestinians-to-same-conduct-he-received-from-the-nazis-the-israelijewish-agenda-lobby-goes-beserk/ 

Another example of the defecation of  U.S. constitutional by the New York Courts influenced by the Isreali Lobby:  Judge Gerald Lebovits allegedly called the female attorney opposing his Jewish Lobby comrades and financial contributors Tishman Speyer and Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel (Paul N. Gruber, Esq., Robert D. Goldstein, Esq.) in the Stuyvesant Town litigations, ‘anti-Semitic.’

 Grow up and go back to Israel if you support the slaughter and human rights violations against women.  It’s clear that if Israeli Lobby supporters can’t do their jobs according to the U.S. constitution, they should not be judges and they should not be involved in any way in U.S. government. 

BREAKING NEWS: Named racketeering defendants CW Capital, Rose Associates, Inc., Tishman Speyer, BlackRock Realty, ST OWNER LP and law firm Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel, P.C. (NYC) IN AFFAVIDIT by their attorney FAIL TO DENY they stalked, harassed, set up anonymous harassing website, committed copyright infringement, and sent death threat to Female Opposing Attorney and Tenant Crime Victim and sent an Intimidator to Female Opposing Attorney’s relative’s home in Massachusetts DURING LITIGATION!

Court documents reveal that named racketeering defendants  CW Capital Asset Management, Rose Associates, Inc. (Adam Rose), Tishman Speyer, BlackRock Realty, ST OWNER LP and law firm Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel (NYC) IN AFFAVIDIT by their attorney FAIL TO DENY they stalked, harassed, set up anonymous harassing website, committed copyright infringement, and sent death threat to Female Opposing Attorney and Tenant Crime Victim and sent an “Intimidator” to Female Opposing Attorney’s relative’s home in Massachusetts DURING LITIGATION!

The Stuyvesant Town Tax fraudsters (Roberts v. Tishman, 13 N.Y.3d 270 (2009) case http://www.courts.state.ny.us/Reporter/3dseries/2009/2009_07480.htm players CW Capital Asset Management, Rose Associates, Inc. (Adam Rose), Tishman Speyer Properties, BlackRock Realty Co., and co-defendant Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel, P.C.in an affidavit by their attorneys AND co-defendant Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel, P.C., (Paul N. Gruber, Esq.) DO NOT DENY the allegations of their alleged criminal misconduct and interference with the legal proceedings in their response to the female Opposing Attorney and Tenant Crime Victim’s request to the court for a default judgment due to the alleged criminal acts and federal obstruction of justice by these named residential real estate racketeering and tax fraud defendants.

Instead, in the court documents, these arrogant alleged “white collar” criminals with friends in high (and low) places (i.e., Governor Andrew Cuomo), are hoping the judges in the Appellate Division, First Department will be like New York State Governor Cuomo and ignore and cover-up the Stuyvesant Town alleged racketeers’ ‘uncivilized’ conduct towards the female attorney, as described in court documents, and continue to reward these defendant Attorneys (who finance the judicial campaigns of the New York State judges) and Billionaire Real Estate Executives for their ability to evade criminal prosecution for years. See http://tishmanspeyerfraud.tumblr.com/post/5642744853/seriously-governor-cuomo-what-are-your-ethical

In court documents, named alleged racketeering defendant and Attorney for CW Capital Asset Management, Rose Associates, Inc. (Adam Rose), Tishman Speyer Properties, BlackRock Realty Co., and co-defendant Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel, P.C., Borah Goldstein’s Paul Gruber, Esq. (who previously threw a pen at the Female Opposing  Attorney and Tenant Crime Victim in front of the New York State Appellate Term, (see http://www.scribd.com/doc/76790186/Tishman-Speyer-Rose-Associates-Borah-Goldstein-Attny-Admission-of-Misconduct-to-Appellate-Term ) fails to dispute the specific allegations of the over four years of alleged criminal obstruction of justice, intimidation, and actual violent acts against the Female Opposing Attorney – during the legal proceedings.

In court documents, named real estate racketeers and tax fraudster defendants CW Capital Asset Management, Rose Associates, Inc. (Adam Rose), Tishman Speyer Properties, BlackRock Realty Co., and co-defendant Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel, P.C., as well as their agents and employees (including, Housing Court Judge Gerald Lebovits and Laurie L. Lau, Fred Knapp, Esq. (CompassRock, CW Capital, Rose Associates, Inc., Tishman Speyer), Gregory Claude, Nicholas Himonidis, Esq., New York Police Department 13th Precinct “Bratton Butcher” thugs P.O. Garcia and Matias) are accused of such ‘uncivilized’ and violent acts against a female Opposing Attorney and Tenant Crime Victim and her family during the legal proceedings described in this separate lawsuit that begs the question:  are these the actions of innocent men? : (for specific outline of the lengths these alleged and named white collar criminals will go to conceal their alleged criminal acts see pages 28 – 32, paragraph 48 (a)- (n)) and below):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/223759234/Verified-Petition-Affidavit-of-Petitioner-In-Support-of-Order-to-Show-Cause-for-Pre-Action-Disclosure-Temporary-Restraining-Order-and-Preliminary-Inj

NEW YORK FEDERAL JUDGE LEWIS KAPLAN RULES IN SCATHING 497 PAGE OPINION THAT LAWYERS (like the CWCapital Asset Management, Rose Associates, Inc. (Adam Rose), Tishman Speyer Properties, BlackRock Realty, and ST OWNER LP’s lawyers Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel, P.C. (Paul N. Gruber, Esq. and Robert D. Goldstein, Esq.)) CAN BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE UNDER THE FEDERAL RICO STATUTES for RACKETEERING /OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE FOR THEIR MISCONDUCT DURING LEGAL PROCEEDINGS…TICK TOCK.

On behalf of their co-defendant named racketeers, named racketeering defendant Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel, P.C., (NYC) Paul N. Gruber, Esq. refused to deny the allegations and instead these alleged male violent stalkers, harassers and obstructers of justice simply continue to act like desperate guilty and frantic cowards who disparage and physically assault and intimidate women.  Thankfully, the United States Courts don’t agree with these New York State Unified Court System’s example of First Department ‘Attorneys’ Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel, P.C. desperate exasperations of disbelief of the accusations that Attorneys and Real Estate Executives could be brought up on Federal Racketeering charges in NEW YORK: 

“Lawyers CAN BE PROSECUTED using RACKETEERING LAWS originally intended for mobsters” http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/03/05/federal-court-plaintiffs-lawyers-can-be-prosecuted-using-racketeering-laws-originally-intended-for-mobsters/

In March of this year, in a 497 page opinion (yes, 497 page opinion) not only did Federal Southern District of New York Judge Lewis Kaplan find this First Department example of ‘Attorney’ GUILTY of racketeering for similar conduct as alleged in the Female Attorney and Tenant Crime Victim’s lawsuit and subsequent petition, the Federal Judge referred this Attorney to the U.S. Attorneys Office for criminal prosecution! The 497 Page Opinion:  http://www.chevron.com/articledocuments/latest/news_203789/1457697f-c289-4781-abce-5b3792c645e1/2014.03.04%20[1874]%20Opinion.pdf.cvxn

While the named racketeering defendants – attorneys and real estate executives – fake exasperation and disbelief and continue to verbally assault the female attorney by calling her ‘crazy cunt’ and ‘stupid bitch’ and try to “discredit [her] by calling [her] anti-semitic and  anti-gay” (yes, Housing Court Judge Gerald Lebovits we know what you did and said, we saw the court documents)—- the facts of this embattled Female Attorney and Tenant Crime Victim’s case against these Borah Goldstein ‘Attorneys’ and their ‘clients’ are eerily similar to the Federal RICO case against the other dirty First Department example of an ‘Attorney’: Chevron Corp.  v.  Donzinger, No. 11 Civ. 0691, (S.D.N.Y., 03/04/2014) (Kaplan, J.).

 This case is extraordinary. The facts are many and sometimes complex. They include things that normally come only out of Hollywood – coded emails among Donziger and his colleagues describing their private interactions with and machinations directed at judges and a court appointed expert, their payments to a supposedly neutral expert out of a secret account, a lawyer who invited a film crew to innumerable private strategy meetings and even to ex parte meetings with judges, an Ecuadorian judge who claims to have written the multibillion dollar decision but who was so inexperienced and uncomfortable with civil cases that he had someone else (a former judge who had been removed from the bench) draft some civil decisions for him, an 18-year old typist who supposedly did Internet research in American, English, and French law for the same judge, who knew only Spanish, and much more. The evidence is voluminous. The transnational elements of the case make it sensitive and challenging. Page 1-2, Opinion of Judge Lewis Kaplan, Chevron Corp.  v.  Donzinger.

 They submitted fraudulent evidence. They coerced one judge, first to use a court-appointed, supposedly impartial, “global expert” to make an overall damages assessment and, then, to appoint to that important role a man whom Donziger hand-picked and paid to “totally play ball” with the LAPs. They then paid a Colorado consulting firm secretly to write all or most of the global expert’s report, falsely presented the report as the work of the court-appointed and supposedly impartial expert, and told half-truths or worse to U.S. courts in attempts to prevent exposure of that and other wrongdoing.” Page 14, Judge Lewis Kaplan Opinion, Chevron Corp.  v.  Donzinger.

Donziger’s misconduct outside the courthouse went hand in hand with his misconduct within it. Both were parts of an offensive to produce a multi-billion dollar payout. Donziger’s “brute force” campaign depended largely on his ability to threaten Chevron…Page 367, Opinion of Judge Lewis Kaplan, Chevron Corp.  v.  Donzinger.

Compare that misconduct to the Female Attorney and Tenant Crime Victim’s allegations of the criminal acts committed by named racketeering defendant law firm Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel (Paul N. Gruber, Esq., Robert D. Goldstein, Esq.), on behalf of and in conjunction with  CWCapital Asset Management, Rose Associates, Inc. (Adam Rose), Housing Court Judges Gerald Lebovits and Laurie L. Lau, Fred Knapp, Esq., Nicholas Himonidis, Esq., Midtown Moving & Storage Inc. described in the court document:  http://www.scribd.com/doc/223759234/Verified-Petition-Affidavit-of-Petitioner-In-Support-of-Order-to-Show-Cause-for-Pre-Action-Disclosure-Temporary-Restraining-Order-and-Preliminary-Inj  Pages 28 – 32, paragraph 48 (a)- (n) quoted below:

Allegations of acts committed by named racketeering defendant Attorneys (Borah Goldstein) and their clients directed at the Female Opposing Attorney and Tenant Crime Victim DURING THE LITIGATION:  Assault, stalking, harassment, violent criminal destruction of property, theft, intimidation of her family, filing of false claims to the Bar to discredit her, sending of anonymous death threats, setting up an anonymous defamatory website to harass and intimidate the female attorney, conspiring with judges of the NYC Housing Court to conceal evidence and submit false statements to the Bar, extortion, submitting false testimony, intimidating female Opposing Attorney’s family in another state…sounds familiar and WORSE.  Are you listening U.S. Attorney General – your job is pretty much done, here—where’s the criminal indictment? From the Court Document:

“(a)   During  pending  legal  proceedings,  between April  20,  2012  and April  30,2012,  Rose  Real  Estate  Racketeering  Defendants  Adam  Rose,  Rose  Associates,Fred  Knapp,  Esq.,  Gregory  Claude,  Borah  Goldstein  and  agents  and  employees acting on their behalf did in fact illegally enter Petitioner’s apartment and commit violent  felony  criminal  destruction  of  all  of  Petitioner’s  property  criminal destruction of [Petitioner’s] property and theft of [Petitioner’s] legal files (See Ex. 13  (photos of the violent  criminal  mischief  and  destruction  of  [Petitioner’s]  property  while  Racketeering Defendant Real Estate Manager Rose Associates, Inc. were under a court order to preserve Petitioner’s apartment and property);

(b)      During  pending  legal  proceedings,  the  Rose  Real  Estate  Racketeering Defendants  Adam  Rose,  Rose  Associates,  Fred  Knapp,  Esq.,  Gregory  Claude, Borah  Goldstein  and  agents  and  employees  acting  on  their  behalf    did  in  fact destroy  and  steal  Petitioner’s  legal  files  and  illegally  harbor  stolen  property refusing  Petitioner  access  which  obstructed  justice  and  interfered  with  legalproceedings.[ ]  

(c)  During  pending  legal  proceedings,  on  April  20,  2012.  Rose  Real  Estate Racketeering  Defendants  Adam  Rose,  Rose  Associates,  Fred  Knapp,  Esq., Gregory Claude, Borah Goldstein and agents and employees acting on their behalf in  an  attempt  to  conceal  the  criminal  acts  of  destruction  of  Petitioner’s  property and theft of [Petitioner’s] legal files, illegally assaulted [Petitioner] and detained [Petitioner], preventing [Petitioner] from  discovering  the  criminal  acts  committed  by  the  Rose  Real  Estate Racketeering Defendants.;

(d)  On December 11, 2011 the physical assault and intimidation of Petitioner by Rose Real Estate Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose, Rose Associates, Inc.’s attorney  Racketeering  Co-Defendant  Paul  N.  Gruber  (Borah  Goldstein)  who threw  a  pen  at  Petitioner  and  repeatedly  slammed  his  hands  down  on  the  table during  oral  argument  in  front  of  the  Appellate  Term  (Hon.  Richard  B.  Lowe  III, Hon.  Martin  Schoenfeld,  Hon.  Alexander  W.  Hunter)  while  Petitioner  was speaking  at  the  podium.    This  conduct  did  in  fact  interfere  with  the  legal proceedings  and  obstruct  justice  as  it  caused  severe  anguish  that  Petitioner  was being  assaulted  and  Chief  Judge  Lowe  interrupted  the  argument,  leaned  in  and shouted  at  Real  Estate  Racketeering  Defendant  Adam  Rose’s  co-defendant Attorney Paul N. Gruber, Esq. that he[Judge Lowe] “was about to throw [Gruber] out  of  the  courtroom.”    Judge  Hunter  added  that  he  [Judge  Hunter]  “had  been watching  [Gruber]  throughout”  the  oral  argument  and  felt  the  same  way.    The violent abuse by Racketeering Defendant Attorney Paul N. Gruber, Esq.  and the shouting  by  the  judges  alike  directed  at  Rose  Racketeering  Defendant  Paul  N. Gruber, Esq. did in fact interfere with Petitioner’s ability to continue the argument in which she stated to the judges: that she was distressed and had been subjected to that conduct throughout the proceedings.  Attached as Exhibit 14 is a true and correct  copy  of  Real  Estate  Racketeering  Defendant  Paul  N.  Gruber,  Esq.’s ‘apology’  to  the  court  with  false  statements  that  his  violence  wasn’t  physical  or audible;    

(e)  During  the  legal  proceedings,  between  December  2011  and  February 2012,  Rose  Real  Estate  Racketeering  Defendant  Adam  Rose’s  Attorney  and Racketeering  Co-Defendant  Attorney  Paul  N.  Gruber,  Esq.  (Borah  Goldstein) knowing  it  was  illegal  to  do  so,  but  in  furtherance  of  the  racketeering  scheme  to obstruct  justice,  interfere  with  legal  proceedings  and  extort  a  crime  victim,  with the  use  of  intimidation  committed  bank  fraud  on  behalf  of  Defendants  by obtaining  confidential  and  private  banking  information  concerning  Petitioner’s business  accounts.    After  confirming  the  illegal  felony  and  RICO  predicate  act with  the  bank,  Petitioner  confronted  Rose  Real  Estate  Racketeering  Defendant Adam  Rose’s  Racketeering  co-defendant  Attorney  Paul  N.  Gruber,  Esq.,  and asked  if  he  obtained  her  private  business  information  and  only  after  being informed  of  the  bank’s  confirmation,  Real  Estate  Racketeering  Defendant  Paul Gruber, Esq. admitted: “a little bit.” 

  (f)  During  the  legal  proceedings,  The    Rose  Racketeering  Defendant  Adam Rose’s  Attorney  and  co-defendant  Paul  N.  Gruber,  Esq.  (Borah  Goldstein) repeatedly raged and screamed in a threatening manner at Petitioner, an Attorney and Crime Victim during legal proceedings, in the hallways of the courthouses to “F*ck Off!” and in front of New York State Supreme Judge Anil N. Singh, that he would only deal with someone “sane.”    

(g)   On  numerous  occasions  during  the  legal  proceedings  between  November 1, 2010 and the present, Rose Real Estate Racketeering Defendant Housing Court Judge  Laurie  L.  Lau  had  improper  and  illegal  communications  with  the  Rose Racketeering  Defendants  and  Co-Defendants  Attorneys  Borah  Goldstein Altschuler  Nahins  &  Goidel,  LP  (Paul  N.  Gruber,  Robert  Goldstein)  concerning Petitioner’s pending cases.

 (h)    On or about July 2012, Rose Real Estate Racketeering Defendant Housing Court  Laurie  Lau  improperly  leaned  over  the  bench  during  pending  legal proceedings  and  disclosed  to  her  Racketeering  Co-Defendant  Borah  Goldstein (Paul  Gruber)  the  identity  of  Petitioner’s  process  server  in  which  Racketeering Defendant  Laurie  Lau  and  her  co-defendants  used  as  the  return  address  on  the First Anonymous Harassing Death Threat in furtherance of their intimidation of a victim/witness and Officer of the Court. 

(i)  On  or  about  February  1,  2011,  during  the  legal  proceedings,  Defendant Adam  Rose’s  attorney  Racketeering  Co-Defendants  Robert  D.  Goldstein,  Esq. (Borah Goldstein) threatened Petitioner Attorney and Crime Victim in the hallway of  the  New  York  City  Housing  Court  that  he  had  only  seen  complaints  like Petitioner’s  RICO  claims  (that  three  New York  State  Judges  subsequently  found meritorious)  by  “crazy  people”  and  that  if  Petitioner  didn’t  drop  the  case,  he would file a complaint with the New York Disciplinary Committee saying she was “crazy” and “unfit to practice law.” 

(j)  During pending legal proceedings, when Racketeering Defendants’ Borah Goldstein’s Robert D. Goldstein’s first extortionist threat to Petitioner to drop her case  or  he  would  file  a  complaint  the  Bar  Disciplinary  Committee  didn’t  work because  Petitioner’s  claims  were  found  to  be  meritorious,  on  or  about  June  12, 2012  Racketeering  Defendant  Housing  Court  Judge  Gerald  Lebovits  conspired with  Borah  Goldstein  (Paul  Gruber,  Esq.,  Robert  D.  Goldstein,  Esq.)  (also  as attorneys  for  all  the  Racketeering  Defendants),  Adam  Rose,  and  Debra  Guzov, Esq.  (Guzov  Offsink)  to  file  a  frivolous  complaint  with  the  New York  State  Bar Disciplinary Committee against Petitioner by submitting, among other things, (1) a photograph and falsely stating a photograph was of Petitioner (which it is not) to discredit  Petitioner;  (2)  attempting  to  obtain  the  identity  of   bloggers  and journalists  writing  about  the  legal  proceedings  in  order  to  violate  the  First Amendment Rights of bloggers and journalists to conceal his and his racketeering co-defendants  wrongdoing,  and  (3)  saying  Petitioner  was  unfit  to  practice  law, solely  to  interfere  with  the  pending  legal  proceedings,  retaliate  against  and intimidate a witness and Officer of the Court, and to extort and harass Petitioner.  

 (j)  Racketeering  Defendant  Housing  Court  Judge  Gerald  Lebovits  retaliated against  Petitioner  for  Petitioner’s  filing  of  a  The  Rose  Racketeering  lawsuit alleging that (1) Gerald Lebovits concealed the fact that he was in communication with  Racketeering  Co-Defendant  Paul  N.  Gruber  (Borah  Goldstein)  through  e-mail  and  otherwise  during  the  legal  proceedings  as  an  ‘expert’  for  Defendant Lebovits  book  in  which  Defendant  Lebovits  received  financial  benefits  and  that (2)  Defendant  Judge  Lebovits  relied  upon  the  ex  parte  communications  and arguments  of  his  ‘expert’  Racketeering  Co-Defendant  Paul  N.  Gruber,  Esq., (Borah  Goldstein)  from  those  communications  and  other  cases  in  the  pending litigation without disclosing this fact to Petitioner.  

(k)   During  pending  legal  proceedings  and  after  Petitioner  gave  testimony  to state officials concerning Rose Real Estate Defendants criminal acts,  on or about August  12,  2012  the  Rose  Real  Estate  Racketeering  Defendants  intimidated Petitioner  (a  witness,  crime  victim  and  Officer  of The  Court)  by  sending  her  the violent and sexually demeaning First Anonymous Harassing Death Threat calling her a “crazy cunt” and telling her that she “f*cked with the wrong people ” using the return address supplied to the Rose Racketeering Defendants by Racketeering Co-Defendant Housing Court Judge Laurie Lau. Ex. 5. 

(l)  During  pending  litigation,  and  after  Petitioner,  blew  the  whistle  on  the Housing  Court  robosigning  scheme  which  included  judges  participation  and reported  such  tax  fraud  to  state  and  federal  authorities,  Rose  Real  Estate Racketeering  Defendant  Adam  Rose’s  employee  co-defendant  Racketeer  Fred Knapp,  Esq.,  committed  two  additional  acts  of  criminal  mischief  by  interfering with  911  emergency  calls:  (1)  on  April  20,  2012,  when  Defendant  Rose Associates’  employees  at  Stuyvesant  Town,  the  Security  Officers,  stalked  and followed  Petitioner  and  would  not  let  her  leave  the  lobby,  physically  preventing her  to  do  so  in  violation  of  her  rights  and  subsequently  upon  their  direction physically  assaulted  Petitioner  to  prevent  her  from  seeing  the  criminal  felony mischief  destruction  of  her  apartment  by  the  Real  Estate  Racketeering Defendants; and (2) on April 30, 2012 after Petitioner walked into her apartment and  saw  the  violent  felony  criminal  mischief  destruction  of  all  of  her  property (  and  extortion  attempt  by  the  Rose  Real  Estate  Racketeering  Defendants interfered with Petitioner’s 911 call and canceled it. 

(m)  During  pending  legal  proceedings,  the  Anonymous  Harassing  Blogger conspired with the Rose Real Estate Racketeering Defendants to discredit, harass, stalk, extort, retaliate against, and intimidate Petitioner a witness/crime victim and Officer  of  the  Court  through  (1)  its  October  11,  2013  mailing  of  the  Second Harassing Anonymous Letter and (2) each separate defamatory, intimidating blog post on the dates specified above in paragraph 20. 

(n)  During  pending  litigation,  and  in  furtherance  of  the  illegal  racketeering scheme  to  obstruct  justice  and  interfere  with  legal  proceedings,  The  Rose  Real Estate Racketeering Defendants for over 4  years retained the services of “private investigators”  (including,  Fred  Knapp,  Esq.,  Nicholas  Himonidis,  Esq.,  Target Research  &  Investigations  Corp.)  who  stalked  Petitioner  online,  harassed  her, illegally  and  improperly  contacted  her  employers,  and  stalked  her  family  and friends.” 

Read em and weep, boys.  Someone’s coming to knock on your proverbially door…

Knock Knock it’s the Southern District of New York U.S. Attorney…

BREAKING NEWS: The Named Stuyvesant Town Racketeering Defendants CW Capital and ST OWNER LP (Tishman Speyer) and others involved in the Female Attorney and Stuyvesant Town Tenant Plaintiff’s racketeering lawsuit pending for over four years have been SUED by Junior Lenders in the Stuyvesant Town Foreclosure in a Scathing Complaint alleging THE SAME MISCONDUCT as the Female Attorney claims!

BREAKING NEWS: The Named Stuyvesant Town Racketeering Defendants CW Capital and ST OWNER LP (Tishman Speyer) and others involved in the Female Attorney and Stuyvesant Town Tenant Plaintiff’s racketeering lawsuit pending for over four years have been SUED by Junior Lenders in the Stuyvesant Town Foreclosure in a Scathing Complaint alleging THE SAME MISCONDUCT as the Female Attorney claims, including ‘racketeering’ misconduct:

TheStuyvesant Town junior lenders headed by Centerbridge Partners further allege that CWCapital engaged in “a continuing pattern of misconduct designed” to maintain control of Stuyvesant Town and “reap an unjust windfall” of $1 billion, according to Bloomberg News.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-07-03/cwcapital-wachovia-bank-are-sued-by-stuyvesant-lenders.html

The New Stuyvesant Town Complaint against CW Capital filed by the Junior Lenders can be found on the Female Attorney and Tenant Crime Victim’s document site [that has over 71,000 views (cumulative)!] – some people are listening to her New York State Unified Court System, maybe you should try it - : PCVST Mezzco 4 LLC v. Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C30, 652045/2014, New York State Supreme Court, New York County (Manhattan):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/232517418/STUYVESANT-TOWN-LITIGATION-AGAINST-CWCapital-by-junior-lenders-PCVST-Mezzco-4-LLC-v-Wachovia-Bank-Commercial-Mortgage-Trust-2007-C30-652045-2014-Ne

and..WOW further BREAKING NEWS: SHOCKING UNDISPUTED ALLEGATIONS against CW Capital and its named racketeering co-conspirators and maybe New York State Unified Court System should start apologizing to the Female Attorney for its discrimination and contribution to the following SHOCKING misconduct and criminal acts as alleged to be committed by CW Capital and its named racketeering co-defendants and DEFENSE ATTORNEYS: including Adam Rose (Rose Associates, Inc.), Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel (Paul N. Gruber, Esq., Robert D. Goldstein, Esq.) (212) 431-1300, Nicholas Himonidis, Esq. (646) 445-7801, Rose Associates’ and now CW Capital’s (CompassRock) henchman Fred D. Knapp, Esq. (212) 420-5000 and New York City Housing Court JUDGES Laurie L. Lau and Gerald Lebovits: allegations of violent and criminal intimidation of an Officer of the Court and Victim/Witness (the Female Attorney and Crime Victim Plaintiff in the pending Stuyvesant Town racketeering lawsuits) filed in pre-action disclosure petition:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/223759234/Verified-Petition-Affidavit-of-Petitioner-In-Support-of-Order-to-Show-Cause-for-Pre-Action-Disclosure-Temporary-Restraining-Order-and-Preliminary-Inj

It is apparent now why named racketeering defendants CW Capital Asset Management, Tishman Speyer, Rose Associates, Inc. (Adam Rose, Fred Knapp, Esq., Gregory Claude), Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel law firm (Paul N. Gruber, Esq., Robert D. Goldstein), New York City Housing Court judges Laurie L. Lau, Gerald Lebovits, Brenda Spears and their Gestapo Squad of thugs including the NYPD 13th precinct, Midtown Moving & Storage, Inc. went to such violent and criminal extremes as alleged in the above linked Petition to discredit and “commit financial and judicial terrorism” against the Female Attorney and Crime Victim/Tenant:

Named racketeering Defendants CW Capital didn’t want the Female Attorney to continue to blow the whistle on CW Capital and its racketeering co-defendants: “ continuing pattern of misconduct” in order for CW Capital to “reap an unjust windfall” of 1 BILLION dollars.

The New Complaint against the named CW Capital and Tishman Speyer racketeering defendants by the millionaire junior lenders against the CW Capital senior Stuyvesant Town lenders makes the following similar allegations that the Female Attorney and Crime Victim Tenant has previously made (yet; the Female attorney alleges that she has been subjected to CW Capital and its attorneys and co-defendants “misogynist threats and abuse” calling her a ‘crazy c*nt’ ‘stupid bitch’ and attempting to discredit her as ‘not sane’ for making the SAME ALLEGATIONS reagarding the continuing pattern of misconduct by CW Capital):

“This Complaint arises out of Defendants’ [CWCapital, ST OWNER LP (Tishman Speyer)] improper actions to wrongfully seize control of …Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village (“Stuyvesant Town”) … through a purported deed in lieu of foreclosure transaction orchestrated and consummated on both sides by CW Capital.”

“The deed in lieu of [foreclosure] transaction was the culmination of a continuing pattern of misconduct designed to (i) keep CWCapital in control of Stuy Town, including its contemplated disposition…”

“Through these wrongful actions, CW Capital will capture an unjustified billion dollar windfall for itself and the other Defendants (including Tishman Speyer).

49. By obtaining the Foreclosure Judgment, CW Capital made an irrevocable decision that it was willing to give up contract and default rate interest in exchange for obtaining the benefits of having a Foreclosure Judgment.”

69. CW Capital intentionally concealed the purported deed in lieu of foreclosure from its Junior Lenders (i.e., despite having secretly obtained a ‘purported deed in lieu of foreclosure’ failed to mention it in an email to its junior lenders later that day.”

Cat got your tongue, New York State Unified Court System? Oh, and where is New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman? How does Governor Cuomo feel now about his million dollar campaign contributer and appointee to New York State Real Estate Committees member…named racketeering defendant Rob Speyer (Tishman Speyer)?

BREAKING NEWS: New York State Supreme Court rules that Stuyvesant Town Named Racketeering Defendants CWCapital Asset Management’s agent and co-defendant thug MIDTOWN MOVING & STORAGE INC. had no legal right to keep all of Attorney and Tenant Victim’s property and Legal Files for OVER TWO YEARS and REFUSES to dismiss tenant’s claims for Conversion, Criminal Mischief, Theft of Property, Extortion, Interference with Contract and Intentional and Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress.

BREAKING NEWS: New York State Supreme Court rules that Stuyvesant Town Named Racketeering Defendants CWCapital Asset Management’s agent and co-defendant thug MIDTOWN MOVING & STORAGE INC. had no legal right to keep all of Attorney and Tenant Victim’s property and Legal Files for OVER TWO YEARS and REFUSES to dismiss tenant’s claims for Conversion, Criminal Mischief, Theft of Property, Extortion, Interference with Contract and Intentional and Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress.

A New York State Supreme Court Judge (Madden) rules in favor of female attorney and tenant crime victim in one of the Stuyvesant Town lawsuits by a tenant in a separate ‘Uniform Commercial Code special proceeding’ brought against named racketeering defendants CWCapital Asset Management, Tishman Speyer, Rose Associates, Inc. (Adam Rose), Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel’s racketeering co-defendant thugs MIDTOWN MOVING & STORAGE, INC. (810 East 170th Street, Bronx, NY 718-542-1440) finding that Midtown Moving (and presumably the unnamed ‘landlord’ i.e., CWCapital Asset Management, Rose Associates, Inc., and Borah Goldstein?) had no ‘possessory’ right to the female tenant crime victim’s household possessions and legal files which they refused to allow tenant to access for over two years!

The court order also stated that it is an ‘uncontested fact that there is no written storage agreement’ between the tenant crime victim and CWCapital Asset Management and Rose Associates, Inc.’s agent thugs Midtown Moving & Storage. In recently filed court documents, it is also revealed that Midtown Moving & Storage doesn’t have any written agreement with anyone including the unnamed ‘landlord’ concerning the alleged theft of the female attorney and tenant crime victim’s property.

Legally, for Midtown Moving & Storage to actually perform such duties as a ‘moving and storage company’ a written agreement is a requirement under New York law. What kind of legal, or illegal, implications does this fact reveal?

Is Midtown Moving & Storage, Inc. concealing the real identity of the ‘landlord’ because as the female attorney and tenant crime victim has been repeatedly alleging in court documents for over two years that the transfer of the property of Stuyvesant Town actually occurred in January 2010 NOT last week when CWCapital Asset Management suddenly canceled the scheduled auction of the property and took the ‘deed in lieu of foreclosure’ AND paid the over $130 million in transfer tax?

http://commercialobserver.com/2014/06/auction-for-stuy-town-canceled-as-cwcapital-grabs-deed-in-lieu-of-foreclosure/

In the subsequent court filings, named racketeering defendants CWCapital Asset Management, Rose Associates, Inc., Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel’s racketeering co-defendant thugs Midtown Moving attempted to validate their actions by submitting a ‘warrant of eviction’ which as the court papers submitted by the tenant crime victim allege prove that the so-called ‘warrant of eviction’ was issued on a prior lease not in effect at the time of the illegal taking of tenant’s apartment.

New York law requires that for a warrant of eviction to be legal and valid, a proceeding concerning the possessory lease needs to filed giving the tenant notice and opportunity to be heard. (New York Real Property Action and Proceedings Law (RPAP) Article 7). Looks like named racketeering defendant Housing Court Judge Laurie L. Lau has some splainin’ to do: as alleged in the court documents Housing Court Judge Laurie L. Lau apparently signed a ‘default’ judgment i.e., without allowing tenant crime victim the opportunity to be heard, and issued/”robosigned” the warrant of eviction on the old lease in violation of New York law.

Looks like all the evidence that the female attorney and tenant crime victim has been prevented from obtaining by the alleged illegal wrangling of the racketeering defendants’ influence over the New York State Supreme Court judges will be revealed during this proceeding: the judge allowed the tenant crime victim to go to a jury for determination of damages concerning Midtown Moving’s unauthorized retention of her property and legal files for over two years as well as for all the other causes of action.

Wonder what Governor Cuomo and his cronies, named racketeering defendants Tishman Speyer and Rob Speyer, as well as New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman are going to do when a female attorney and tenant crime victim succeeds in doing the job they refuse to do because of their financial and political connections. Time to get Governor Cuomo and his cronies out of office.

Tenants Rights: 1

Racketeering Defendants and Robosigning Judges: 0.

HOW FAR WILL THE NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT JUDGES IN THE FIRST DEPARTMENT GO TO COVER-UP THE ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT OF THEIR COLLEAGUES and THE LAWYERS (Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel) THAT FUND THEIR CAMPAIGNS?

HOW FAR WILL THE NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT JUDGES IN THE FIRST DEPARTMENT GO TO COVER-UP THE ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT OF THEIR COLLEAGUES and THE LAWYERS (Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel) THAT FUND THEIR CAMPAIGNS?

It looks like another New York County Supreme Court Judge DONNA MILLS jumped on the “bending over backwards” bandwagon for the racketeering co-conspirators named in current civil litigation in the New York Supreme Court including Real Estate Millionaire ADAM ROSE (Rose Associates, Inc.) involved in the Stuyvesant Town $25 million dollar tax fraud litigations.*FN1 below.

Apparently, JUDGE DONNA MILLS just robo-signed the handwritten order written by named racketeering co-conspirator ADAM ROSE’S very own named racketeering co-conspirator lawyer DEBRA GUZOV, ESQ. (GUZOV, INC.) ORDERING YAHOO, INC. and TUMBLR, Inc. TO HAND OVER all of our private identification information despite the fact that named RACKETEERING CO-CONSPIRATOR ADAM ROSE didn’t state any valid claims AND his claims are outside the statute of limitations.

ANOTHER example of the corruption in the New York State Unified Court System—-and this blog is not the first blog to disclose this information concerning the favoritism and bias of the New York State Unified Court System (NY County) http://newyorkcourtcorruption.blogspot.com: A VERY OWN COURT EMPLOYEE of the New York State Bar Disciplinary Committee blew the whistle on the New York State Unified Court System stating that she was told to white-wash complaints against certain attorneys and law firms. This is the very same disciplinary committee that has been working for the named racketeering co-conspirators ADAM ROSE, DEBBIE GUZOV, Esq., Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel, P.C. (Robert D. Goldstein, Esq.), as well as a named racketeering co-conspirator Judge Gerald Lebovits during the legal proceedings to harass the female attorney and victim of violent crimes committed by these very same attorney and real estate named racketeers attempting to get the private information of this blog—- how much you want to bet Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel are attorneys that the Disciplinary Committee refused to investigate? See Anderson v. New York State Unified Court System (SDNY Index No. 07civ09599) (In Judge Shira A. Scheindlin’s US Federal Court Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson Reveals a “Cleaner”, Naomi Goldstein, at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department ETHICS Committee allegedly Whitewashing Complaints for US Attorneys, DA’s and Lawyers who have a political and financial ties to the Courts.)

Another example of what happens to individuals who blow the whistle on the *alleged criminal acts of New York State Court employees – cover-ups and harassment even against attorneys.

*FN1 See Roberts v. Tishman Speyer http://www.courts.state.ny.us/Reporter/3dseries/2009/2009_07480.htm and New York Magazine article about the scheme http://nymag.com/realestate/features/53797/ describing the scheme to violate New York Rent Stabilized law to illegally turn over apartments to charge market rate all the while collecting J-51 $25 million dollars in tax breaks for Rent Stabilized (“At the weekly staff meetings at the on-site management office[Rose Associates, Inc. for Stuyvesant Town], the most important question was, How many rent-stabilized apartments had been recovered? You would get a daily e-mail if they got a unit back,” a former employee explains. Rob [Speyer, Tishman Speyer]’s team had developed a two-part strategy for making the Stuy Town deal work. They would remove tenants who were illegally occupying rent-stabilized apartments, at one point employing three different law firms in the effort [Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins& Goidel, Belkin Burden]. Tishman Speyer has issued 1,009 nonrenewal notices, totaling 12 percent of the rent-stabilized leases. At one of the meetings, in December 2006, Adam Rose, the co-president of Rose Associates who was managing Stuy Town’s operations at the time, set off alarms among the group when he told them it would be realistic to recover just 8 percent of the rent-stabilized apartments in the first year, which was almost double the historical average.”

HERE ARE OUR FILED OBJECTIONS TO RACKETEERING DEFENDANT ADAM ROSE (Rose Associates Inc.)’s IMPROPER ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN OUR CONFIDENTIAL PRIVATE IDENTITY INFORMATION in Adam R. Rose v. Yahoo! Inc., and Tumble (Index No. 152439/2014 New York Supreme Court, New York County)

CASE NUMBER: Index Number 152439/2013 

Adam R. Rose v. Yahoo Inc. et. al

TO: Judge Donna Mills

111 Centre Street, Room 545

New York, NY 10013

(646) 386-3348

ANONYMOUS BLOGGER/(S) STUYVESANT TOWN FRAUD’s

OBJECTIONS TO Millionaire Real Estate Exec. Adam Rose’s Request for Constitutionally Protected Identity Information

In order to maintain my ANONYMITY, which is my constitutional right, I will post my objections to Millionaire Real Estate Exec. Adam Rose’s ( of Rose Associates, Inc., 200 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10010 (212) ) attempt to violate my rights by trying to get confidential and protected identity information of ANONYMOUS BLOGGER/(S) through his request for pre-action discovery, TO THE WEBSITES named in the request, so the court can go to the websites and verify that these objections are coming from the Anonymous Blogger/(s) of the websites.

I, THE ANONYMOUS BLOGGER/(S) of the websites, hereby affirms under penalty of perjury to the truth of the following:

1. I am an Anonymous Blogger/(s) that is the author of the tumblr, wordpress and twitter posts attached to Millionaire Real Estate Exec. Adam Rose’s affidavit as exhibits 1-3. I submit these affirmed objections to oppose Adam Rose’s request for pre-action discovery of all identity information of the blogger/s, blogs and posts by the means stated in this court’s order of March 25, 2014 (i.e. written objections) which was sent to me by Tumblr and Twitter (wordpress is not aware of the action).

2. I have never been served a copy of the stipulated order that was filed on April 5, 2014 as directed in the order, but to preserve my rights I am submitting these objections and serving and filing them through the courts on-line filing system which I am told automatically e-mails attorneys for Adam Rose and Tumblr and Twitter.

3. First and foremost, the frivolous request should be denied because Adam Rose has simply failed to even IDENTIFY ANY STATEMENTS and before the court considers anything, Adam Rose was required to show an actionable claim of defamatory statements —- he failed to do so, and even failed to point to STATEMENTS that he doesn’t like. This Blogger respectfully requests that this court actually read the posts attached to Adam Rose’s Affidavit – to see that the QUOTED TEXT that Adam Rose points to including: “corrupt white collar criminal” and Adam Rose’s malicious FALSE STATEMENT in his Affidavit paragraph 7:”…even claiming I[Adam Rose] was under “indictment” or Adam Rose’s allegations that the blog posts falsely say that he is being under investigation by the federal authorities ARE NOT FOUND ANYWHERE IN THE BLOG POSTS. The fact that Adam Rose absolutely LIED about the very existence of posts “claiming [Adam Rose] was under “indictment”” should be enough for this court to DENY his request based on his INTENTIONAL FALSE STATEMENTS UNDER OATH.

Additionally, the phrase “connection to child pornography” was used in a QUESTION —- followed by question marks and in the context of discussing the court documents that allege Adam Rose and his attorneys are in possession of documents from a legal case that include documents depicting child pornography. See Affidavit of Adam Rose Exhibit 1, posts 3 discussing latest developments in court proceedings.

4. Second, even with Adam Rose’s FAILURE to EVEN SAY THE STATEMENTS which defeats his attempt to make out a claim for defamation, this court must look at the random words IN CONTEXT AND THE ACTUAL STATEMENTS. For instance: Adam Rose conveniently and with intent to DECEIVE THIS COURT TO OBTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND PROTECTED INFORMATION through deceit, Adam Rose fails to mention that before each of the words that Adam Rose doesn’t like and in the full context of the sentences are statements: “as alleged in court proceedings” “in court documents” “alleged” —— all commenting and reporting on legal proceedings and the allegations in those documents as well as blogger/s’ opinions about the allegations.

5. CASE LAW: Even though Adam Rose did not even quote any statements that he is required to do to allege a claim of defamation, even his lawyer Debra Guzov, Esq. argued in a case against pre-action discovery the following which applies here: These cases and statements were found NOT ACTIONABLE:

Bruno v. Shukart, 177 N.Y.S. 2D 51 (Monroe Sup. 1958)(“[y]ou’re a liar and a crook” and “[y]ou’re a no-good crook” held to be non-actionable, and holding that the term “crook” in particular is not slander per se.”)

Torain v. Liu, 2007 WL 2331073 *2-3 (statements made by city council member at a press conference that plaintiff was a “lunatic” and “a sick pedophile loser” were not defamatory.”)

Polish Am. Immigration Relief Comm. Inc.,189 A.D. 2D at 374, 596 N.Y.S.2d 756 (1993)(description of organization as “madhouse” and its members as “thieves” and “false do-gooders” constituted non-actionable expressions of opinions under Federal or State constitutional standards.”

Kneival v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1075 (9th Cir. 2004)([t]he context in which the statement appears is paramount to our analysis [of whether statement is defamatory], and in some cases can be dispositive”and “although the word ‘pimp’ may be reasonably capable of defamatory meaning when read in isolation, we agree with the District Court’s assessment that ‘the term loses its meaning when considered in the context.” Id. At 1074.

Koch v. Goldway, 817 F.2d 507, 509 (9th Cir. 1987)(“[c]ontext does resolve the matter”).

Old Dominion Branch No. 496, Nat’l Ass’n of Letter Carriers v. Austin, 418 U.S. 264, 286 (1974)(protecting “rhetorical hyperbole, a lusty and imaginative expression of contempt” such as defendant’s characterization of plaintiff as a “scab” and a “traitor” with “rotten principles” )

Mann v. Abel, 10 N.Y.3d 271, 279 (2008)(“[e]xpressions of opinion are deemed privileged, and no matter how offensive, cannot be the subject of an action for defamation.”)

“The New York Constitution provides absolute protection from defamation from defamation suits for statements of rhetorical hyperbole.” Immuno AG. v. Moor-Jamkowski, 77 N.Y.2d 235, 249 (1991)(the “protections afforded by the guarantees of free press and speech in the New York Constitution is often broader than the minimum required by” the Federal Constitution.)

The Blogs in question discuss various legal and political issues concerning the financial crisis, the integrity of the American legal system and legal cases across the country and the world and have a worldwide public interest AND do not focus solely on Adam Rose or the Stuyvesant Town foreclosure and tax fraud.

6. The blogs in question are a public forum to discuss the various legal cases and issues concerning the financial crisis, mortgages, foreclosures (including the Bernie Madoff cases), as well as cases involving the public integrity and misconduct of public officials, police, judges, lawyers, and wall street executives across the country and worldwide. The blog also reports on the various investigations and U.S. Attorneys in many states’ actions and decisions. This reporting on public legal proceedings concerns topics of great public interest, not only in New York City, but across the United States and WORLDWIDE.

7. The blogs in question do not focus solely on Adam Rose, nor solely on the Stuyvesant Town foreclosure and the Roberts v. Tishman, 13 N.Y.3d 270 (2009) case http://tinyurl.com/c6jgml6 which found that those involved in Stuyvesant Town did in fact improperly violate the New York rent stabilized law and they did in fact obtain over $25 million dollars in improper tax breaks (i.e. which can be defined as ‘tax fraud’). Adam Rose was involved in the management of Stuyvesant Town during that time and also was involved in the planning stages of the owners’ scheme to destabilize rent stabilized apartments at Stuyvesant Town. See as reported on another website: http://nymag.com/realestate/features/53797/ (“At the weekly staff meetings at the on-site management office[Rose Associates, Inc. for Stuyvesant Town], the most important question was, How many rent-stabilized apartments had been recovered? You would get a daily e-mail if they got a unit back,” a former employee explains. Rob [Speyer, Tishman Speyer]’s team had developed a two-part strategy for making the Stuy Town deal work. They would remove tenants who were illegally occupying rent-stabilized apartments, at one point employing three different law firms in the effort [Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins& Goidel, Belkin Burden]. Tishman Speyer has issued 1,009 nonrenewal notices, totaling 12 percent of the rent-stabilized leases. At one of the meetings, in December 2006, Adam Rose, the co-president of Rose Associates who was managing Stuy Town’s operations at the time, set off alarms among the group when he told them it would be realistic to recover just 8 percent of the rent-stabilized apartments in the first year, which was almost double the historical average.”).

8. The blogs in question report on various legal proceedings, police cases, financial frauds across the country as well as my personal political and religious opinions at times. Because Adam Rose doesn’t agree with the personal political and religious opinions of the anonymous blogger/s doesn’t give him the right to violate my First Amendment Rights to report on pending litigation and to express my political and religious opinions (i.e., Adam Rose attached a tweet (1 of only 3 tweets) as a post he didn’t like which is directed at the U.S. State Department concerning Israel’s oppression of Palestinians and my political opinion that the U.S. State department shouldn’t get involved and should instead deal with the financial crisis here in the United States). (See Adam Rose’s Exhibit 3).

Statute of Limitations for defamation cause of action has expired= no valid cause of action

9. I object to the request for pre-action discovery of confidential identity information on the grounds that the Statute of Limitations has expired for Adam Rose’s alleged claims for defamation concerning any blog posts and statements he is complaining about prior to March of 2013. And request that the court disregard Adam Rose’s attempt to deceive this court into thinking he has a valid claim by using words and phrases that do not even exist in the attached 4 tumblr posts, 1 wordpress post, and 3 tweets (twitter) attached as ‘evidence’ to Adam Rose’s affidavit.

10. The Blogs in question: (1) Tumblr blog: http://tishmanspeyerfraud.tumblr.com/ (2) Wordpress: http://tishmanspeyerfraud.wordpress.com/category/stuyvesant-town/ and (3) Twitter: https://twitter.com/StuyTownFraud have been in existence for 3 ½ years (tumblr), 3 years (twitter) and 2 years (wordpress). While not all those who follow the blogs are publicly identified, the twitter blog is followed by (meaning, the accounts specifically request to be notified when new tweets are posted) news organizations (e.g. ny post), reporters from nationwide news organizations (e.g., bloomberg news), fraud whistleblowers, and politicians (chuck schumer and senator liz krueger) and others interested in the public discussions. There are no commercial advertisements on the blogs, it is for Blogger/s commentary and expression of opinions concerning public interest cases and events.

The Requests are overbroad and improperly/illegally request confidential and protected information for: EVERY LONG-IN INFORMATION for the life of the Blogs as well as EVERY identifying information for EVERY POST – including posts that cannot be the subject of any actionable claim (Statute of Limitations expired) and posts that are not alleged by Adam Rose as defamatory and are NOT NECESSARY AND MATERIAL to form a claim.

11. I object to the request for pre-action discovery of confidential identity information on the grounds that the request is overbroad asks for EVERY LOG-IN for identifying information and for EVERY and ALL POSTS which not only violate privacy and First Amendment Rights: (Adam Rose does not have a valid actionable claim for any post PRIOR to March 18, 2013 (he filed this action on March 18, 2014 – 1 year statute of limitation) and but also this information is “NOT NECESSARY OR MATERIAL” to form a complaint which Adam Rose has to prove also to violate blogger/s constitutional rights.

12. THE DATES OF ALL THE BLOG POSTS are Publicly Available on the posts. On Tumblr, the dates of whether or not any posts are under the one year statute of limitation are easily publicly accessible: GO TO THE ARCHIVE button on the left column of the Tumblr web site. There, it goes by date – and put the cursor over the archived posts, and the EXACT date shows up. Adam Rose does not need LOG IN information to ascertain the dates. Wordpress and Twitter have the dates on them.

NO VALID CAUSE OF ACTION for DEFAMATION: Defamation requires the exact statement that Adam Rose alleges is defamatory. He has not shown ANYWHERE on ANY POST he used as EVIDENCE any quoted statements that he is alleging is defamatory.

13. I object to the request for pre-action disclosure on the grounds that Adam Rose has failed to allege any statements in the attached blog posts to his Affidavit Tumblr (4 posts); Wordpress (1 post) and Twitter (3 tweets) that are grounds for a valid cause of action for defamation.

14. Adam Rose lied about when he became aware of the blogs because in May 9, 2012, Adam Rose and his lawyer Debra Guzov, Esq. sent TUMBLR a notice pursuant to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act claiming the blog violated a copyright in “emails” that he sent to the Plaintiff in the pending lawsuits reported on in the blogs that were part of the public court record AND an email posted on another blog (Lux Living) in which Adam Rose harassed THAT anonymous blogger. See blog post attached to Adam Rose’s Affidavit Exhibit 1 (posts 1 and 2) that describes the incident. See Attachment 1below, a copy of the May 9, 2012 (two years ago) Adam Rose and Debra Guzov, Esq. Attempt to claim defamation with the DMCA letter.

15. Adam Rose’s First Attempt to Illegally Obtain the Information Requested in this Action: the Constitutionally Protected Anonymous Blogger/s Identities: On May 9, 2012, Adam Rose and his lawyer sent a DMCA letter to Tumblr concerning harassing emails that Adam Rose wrote to two tenants: one, the anonymous blogger of the blog Lux Living, and the others to the female tenant lawyer who is the plaintiff in the pending litigations against Adam Rose. All those emails were and are still in the public court records. BUT, in order to dispute a frivolous DMCA notice, TUMBLR requires the Anonymous Blogger’s to IDENTIFY themselves. This is another illegal way to violate the rights of Anonymous Bloggers. To protect myself, physically also since the documented violent acts that Adam Rose is accused of (and has never denied in any court document) are quite violent and the acts Adam Rose is accused of committing against the female tenant lawyer in the pending cases are outrageous years long attacks, I chose not to disclose my Identity and to voluntary remove the QUOTES of the emails (since no actual physical emails were posted, just quotes from the court documents.) Compare the First Two blog posts in Exhibit 1 of Adam Rose’s Affidavit. At no point was this Anonymous Blogger found guilty of violating ANY terms of service of Tumblr or even the DMCA, I just chose to exercise my First Amendment Right to maintain my anonymity.

16. Also, even though Adam Rose and Debra Guzov, Esq. told TUMBLR the blog was ‘defamatory’ and violated their terms of service —- TUMBLR did not agree AND did not take down the blog because this blog did NOT VIOLATE THE TERMS OF SERVICE, and IS NOT DEFAMATORY, NOT HARRASSING, NOT ABUSIVE – according to TUMBLR’s refusal to agree with Adam Rose and Debra Guzov’s claims of ‘defamation.’

17. Adam Rose’s SECOND Attempt to Illegally Obtain the Information Requested in this Action: the Constitutionally Protected Anonymous Blogger/s Identities: As reported in the Blog post in Exhibit 1 of Adam Rose’s Affidavit, posts 1 and 2 (dated March 2014), Adam Rose and Debra Guzov, Esq. asked the disciplinary committee of the Bar to attempt to get the Anonymous Blogger/s identities by harassing the female lawyer plaintiff in the pending litigation in concealed from the public proceedings free of charge to Adam Rose and to hide from the public this second illegal attempt to violate the First Amendment Rights of anonymous bloggers. ADAM ROSE AND HIS LAWYER DEBRA GUZOV DO NOT DENY THE ALLEGATIONS IN THE POSTS CONCERNING THIS FACT.

18. Defamation requires specific statements and the statements must be defamatory IN CONTEXT. Here, Adam Rose just says words (and phrases that he QUOTES THAT ARE NOT IN ANY BLOG POST ATTACHED AS EVIDENCE). See above case law paragraph 5 above. Adam Rose conveniently leaves out the fact that the words he objects to are preceded by the phrases including “as alleged in court documents” – IN CONTEXT discussing allegations in court documents and opinions about them.

18 a. Also, THERE IS NO WHERE IN THE BLOG POSTS submitted by Adam Rose as Evidence nor any statement that he identifies supporting his claim that the blog posts “falsely accuse [Adam Rose] of being under investigation by the federal authorities” Adam Rose Affidavit Paragraph 5. Adam Rose didn’t even quote any statement to support this – all this court has to do is ACTUALLY READ THE POSTS – and only the POSTS SUBMITTED.

19. The Specific Posts attached as Evidence: Tumblr Posts (4 of them)(Adam Rose Affidavit, Exhibit 1):

(a) Posts 1 and 2 (dated March 11, 2014, March 7, 2014): commentary about Adam Rose and Debra Guzov’s DMCA attempt to shut down the blog with false claims of defamation (first attempt), the commentary on the e-mail evidence submitted in court proceedings concerning Adam Rose’s harassment through e-mails against another anonymous blogger in addition to the female lawyer who is the plaintiff in pending litigation, and the secret proceedings by the new york courts free of charge to Adam Rose to illegally obtain anonymous bloggers identities second attempt): any references to Adam Rose refer to him in the CONTEXT of describing the legal proceedings and the allegations of the complaints including the causes of action against him racketeering, felony criminal mischief; the posts describe documents in court proceedings submitted as evidence and my opinion and commentary on them.

(b) Post 3 (dated February 3, 2014): commentary IN CONTEXT discussing the latest news concerning legal proceedings, allegations of the submitted court documents Additionally, the phrase “connection to child pornography” was used in a QUESTION —- followed by question marks and in the context of discussing the court documents that allege Adam Rose and his attorneys are in possession of legal files that contain Disney documents that contain child pornographic scenes “Disney scripts in that lawsuit contained child pornography, sex in front of a priest, threesomes and other scenes that Disney and the Quinn Emanuel law firm wouldn’t want the public to know about”; as well as the secret proceedings by the new york courts free of charge to Adam Rose to illegally obtain anonymous bloggers identities (second attempt): any references to Adam Rose refer to him in the CONTEXT of describing the legal proceedings and the allegations of the complaints including the causes of action against him racketeering, felony criminal mischief; the posts describe documents in court proceedings submitted as evidence and my opinion and commentary on them.

(c) Post 4 (dated December 12, 2013): The Headline is directed at the New Yor Police Department (NYPD): “Hey NYPD, sound familiar?: FBI probe results in 18 LA sheriffs deputies indicted for conspiracy, obstruction of justice and civil rights violations”; concerns commentary and reporting on the Los Angeles Sheriff’s department including a press conference video, and references the similar allegations present in new york litigation against the New York Police Department and specifically the 13th precinct of the NYPD (the police officers who have alleged ties to Adam Rose and Stuyvesant Town.); and this Blogger/s’ opinions and hopes that a similar probe and arrest would occur concerning the defendants in the pending new york litigation (which include Adam Rose who was identified specifically as a DEFENDANT – clearly referring to and commenting on legal proceedings).

20. The Specific Posts attached as Evidence: Wordpress Post (1 post)(Adam Rose Affidavit, Exhibit 2): Post 1 (dated July 3, 2013): The headline concerns the adding of an additional defendant to the current pending lawsuits concerning the robo-signing in the New York City Housing Courts and the commentary and description of the allegations along with the identification of the other DEFENDANTS – including Adam Rose. And the posts concerns the description of the allegations. It appears as though Adam Rose wants to incite this Court by including a post concerning a defendant who is a colleague of this court (like other judges in the New York State Supreme Court system whose personal opinions and biases have improperly affected their decisions in the pending cases. This Anonymous Blogger/s respectfully requests that this Court not be sucked into Adam Rose’s improper attempt to incite this Court to rule against Anonymous Blogger/s by including a clearly non-defamatory and irrelevant post which focuses on legal proceedings brought against judges. Any references to Adam Rose refer to him in the CONTEXT of describing the legal proceedings and the allegations of the complaints and my opinion and commentary on them.

21. The Specific Posts attached as Evidence: Twitter Tweets (3 post)(Adam Rose Affidavit, Exhibit 3): First and Foremost, tweets are limited to 140 characters the CONTEXT and nature of tweets must be taken into consideration. Hashtags= “#” are used to drive twitter traffic to articles of interest concerning those words. A hashtag with a person’s name cannot be considered defamatory.

(a) Tweet 1 (concerns a Question to Governor Cuomo regarding his million dollar campaign contributor (Rob Speyer) a named defendant in some stuyvesant town legal proceedings (which Adam Rose managed at the time the allegations concern). The tweet includes a link to the above mentioned non-defamatory tumblr post concerning the legal proceedings that included the allegations that defendant Adam Rose and his attorneys and co-defendants were in unauthorized possession of the plaintiff attorney’s legal files which included a separate case against Disney, including Disney scripts containing child pornographic scenes. See Paragraph 19(b) above. Hashtags (#) indicated articles and websites that discuss and express their opinions on the hashtags. Adam Rose is not even in the tweet, just the link to the above-mentioned tumblr post.

(b) Tweet 2 (September 2, 2013 concerns this Anonymous Blogger/s personal political and religious opinions concerning the U.S.’s involvement with Israel and Israel’s request at the time for U.S. Involvement with its political agenda concerning Syrian Rebels at the time.) The Tweets MUST BE TAKEN IN CONTEXT – this tweet was part of a succession of tweets (the first of 3 – the second one continued the conversation: “@StateDept Should we as #Syrian #Rebels 2TakeCareOF #NYPD #criminals & #Tishman Speyer # Adam Rose #racketeers? #TakeCareOfYourCriminals” and then another Tweet that starts off: “Dear #SyrianRebels…” Again, the hashtags are merely references that you click on and the hashtag lists all articles/tweets concerning that hashtag. The “#AdamRose” hashtag – it is identified in blue meaning that when you click on his name, all tweets/articles on him will be listed —- including the tweets concerning his involvement with the numerous racketeering Stuyvesant town litigation. A HASHTAG leads the reader to ALL ARTICLES about the hashtag. Here, ‘Adam Rose’ name was a hashtag after a list of various hashtags which would lead to articles about the stuyvesant town racketeering (which is a crime which victims can sue for civil damages) cases. This tweet is my political and religious opinion and commentary on world wide news with great public interest. Just because Adam Rose doesn’t like or agree with my political and religious beliefs, doesn’t mean that the tweet is defamatory and to rule otherwise, would be a denial of my right to express my political and religious beliefs as well.

(c) Tweet 3 (July 4, 2013 this tweet is commentary concerning my belief that crimes against veterans are hate crimes and hate crimes if committed by individuals should be given prison sentences. In no way does that tweet make a statement that Adam Rose was sentenced to prison. Again, a hashtag leads to articles about the words – this hashtag concerning Adam Rose would lead to articles concerning the pending ligation and the allegations that Adam Rose committed felony criminal mischief against the female attorney tenant and violently destroyed property including her families’ property (including her father who was a Veteran) (all reported in legal proceedings and on the blogs) after she filed her racketeering lawsuit. Just because Adam Rose doesn’t like or agree with my political doesn’t mean that the tweet is defamatory and to rule otherwise, would be a denial of my right to express my political views.

Conclusion: Adam Rose failed to even identify STATEMENTS that he claims are defamatory and DOES NOT HAVE ANY ACTIONABLE VALID CAUSES OF ACTION – and even if he did, the information he requests (i.e. ALL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION FOR THE WHOLE 3 years of blog information) is NOT MATERIAL AND NECESSARY to form a claim.

Adam Rose has failed to support any reason to violate the First Amendment Rights to confidentiality and anonymity of Bloggers and it is requested that this Court deny the request.

Signed:

x Stuyvesant Town Fraud (Anonymous Blogger)

stuyvesant.town.fraud@gmail.com

ATTACHMENT 1 

(May 9, 2012 – Adam Rose’s First Attempt to illegally obtain Bloggers’ Identity – DMCA Notice)

image

image

image

image

NOT A SURPRISE: Millionaire Real Estate Racketeering Defendant and Suer of Blog Sites Adam Rose supported Penis Texter and Lack of Respect for Women-izer Anthony Weiner

Yes, no wonder Adam Rose seems to think he can get away with his misdeeds (See: http://tishmanspeyerfraud.tumblr.com/post/81212700420/breaking-news-millionaire-real-estate-racketeering ) in his harassing attempts to sue YAHOO and TUMBLR to violate the First Amendment Rights of bloggers who report on legal proceedings in which he is accussed of violent criminal acts, real estate tax fraud, racketeering and…harassing female tenants.

This is what Millionaire Real Estate Racketeering Defendant and Suer of Blog Sites Adam Rose (Rose Associates, Inc.) had to say about disgraced former Congressmen and uncontrollable penis texter Anthony Weiner last April when Anthony Weiner announced his soon to-fail-due-to-even-more-untrollable-penis-texting mayoral candidacy:

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ex-backers-cool-weiner-run-article-1.1314503

"Only one former donor contacted by The News — Adam Rose, co-president of apartment building developer Rose Associates — was openly enthusiastic, saying he’s “100%” behind Weiner trying another run for mayor.

“I think he’s a terrific candidate and would be a great mayor,” said Rose, who raised at least $13,500 for Weiner in 2008. He added, “Personal failings fade with time in people’s minds.”

"PERSONAL FAILINGS FAD WITH TIME IN PEOPLE’S MINDS." = this is what Racketeering Defendant Adam Rose apparently hopes by SUING BLOGS AND BLOGGERS for writing about legal proceedings and stating their opinions on them will accomplish —- to ILLEGALLY VIOLATE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS to keep the atrocities he is accused of committing OUT OF THE PUBLIC’S MIND. Is this Nazi Germany…or the United State of America?

Birds of a Feather.